Back

The Revised Diploid Genome Sequence of an Individual Human: An Optimized Assembly Workflow for Scaling of near Telomere-to-Telomere Assemblies

Lok, S.; Lau, T. N.; Tong, A. H.; Trost, B.; Reuter, M. S.; Thiruvahindrapuram, B.; Paton, T.; MacDonald, J. R.; Lau, L.; Marshall, C. R.; Venter, J. C.; Scherer, S. W.

2026-05-08 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.05.01.26352134 medRxiv
Show abstract

The first draft diploid genome assembly (HuRef) of an individual released in 2007 was a milestone in genomics. Here, we report HuRef2.0, a revision of HuRef assembled using a scalable two-step workflow employing only Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) Simplex reads and the hifiasm assembler. Results are close in continuity to the recent telomere-to-telomere (T2T) assemblies, but were assembled from standard DNA samples without using multiple sequencing and mapping technologies, including ultra-long-reads and/or proximity-ligation. Three ONT flowcells ([~]103x coverage) from fresh blood DNA produced an assembly comprising 26 contigs, with gapless assembly of 23 chromosomes. Two gaps on chromosome (Chr)Y were locally assembled to yield the final T2T-assembly, HuRef2.0, with base accuracy >Q60 and 2,393 phase blocks with an NG50 value of 2.36 Mb. Assembly from a single ONT flowcell ([~]35x coverage) consistently produced an assembly more contiguous than GRCh38.p14, providing a foundation for further optimization and scaling. Assembly quality was assessed by direct chromosome-level alignments to reference genome, variant calling, and the annotation of gene-rich regions at Chr22q11, the extended MHC locus on Chr6, and several difficult to assemble regions of the genome, including the ribosomal RNA gene clusters, the sub-telomeric region on Chr4q35, and ChrY. More accurate but shorter Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) HiFi-reads produced less contiguous assemblies than from equivalent coverage of error-corrected ONT reads, indicating the importance of read-length. Finally, we compared HuRef2.0 to an assembly of an EBV-transformed lymphoblastoid cell line derived from the same donor. We observed no notable structural differences, indicating that low-passage archival transformed cells are reliable sources for genomic analysis.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 13%
13.0%
3
Nature Genetics
286 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.9%
4
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.3%
5
Cell Genomics
172 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.6%
7
The American Journal of Human Genetics
234 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
8
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.8%
9
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.7%
10
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
11
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
12
Life Science Alliance
285 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
14
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
15
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
17
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
18
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.1%
19
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.9%
21
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
22
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
23
Nature Biotechnology
172 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%