Back

Generation, Characterization and Comparison of Ovine Induced Pluripotent and Embryonic-Disc Stem Cells

Catarina Silva-Almeida, C.; Mee, P. J. J.; Esquiva Diaz, M.; Ali, W.; Ho, S.; Pickup, M.; Webb, S.; Rajesh, D.

2026-05-05 cell biology
10.64898/2026.04.30.721919 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Pluripotent stem cells derived from livestock species represent valuable systems for studying early mammalian development and for establishing renewable, well-defined cell sources; however, direct comparative characterization of distinct pluripotent stem cell platforms in sheep remains limited. In this study, we established and evaluated two ovine pluripotent stem cell types: reprogrammed induced pluripotent stem cells (siPSCs) and embryonic disc-derived stem cells (sEDSCs). Both siPSCs and sEDSCs exhibited core features of pluripotency, including compact colony morphology, alkaline phosphatase activity, expression of key pluripotency-associated markers, and maintenance of a normal ovine karyotype. Flow cytometry and quantitative RT-PCR analyses revealed broadly overlapping yet distinguishable pluripotency marker expression profiles between the two cell types. Functional pluripotency was confirmed by embryoid body formation and in vitro differentiation into derivatives of all three germ layers. To further assess lineage-specific differentiation competence and compare functional outputs relevant to mesodermal differentiation, both pluripotent stem cell types were directed towards the adipogenic lineage. While siPSCs and sEDSCs were each capable of adipogenic differentiation, differences in differentiation efficiency and marker expression were observed. Together, these findings demonstrate that ovine siPSCs and sEDSCs share core pluripotency characteristics while retaining distinct molecular and functional properties, providing a robust comparative framework for studies of ovine pluripotency, lineage specification, and stem cell biology.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.5%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.5%
3
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.3%
4
Stem Cell Research
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
5
Stem Cells
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
8
Stem Cell Reports
118 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
9
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.8%
10
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
11
Cytotherapy
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
78 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
13
Biology of Reproduction
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.3%
15
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
18
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
21
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
FEBS Open Bio
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
26
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
28
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
29
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
30
Molecular Biology Reports
19 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%