Back

Temporal changes in allele frequency facilitate detection of adaptive variants in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) breeding programs

Johansen, N. H.; Sarup, P.; Hansen, P.; Orabi, J.; Jahoor, A.; Ramstein, G. P.

2026-05-04 genetics
10.64898/2026.04.30.721918 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In quantitative genetics, candidate SNPs are identified through genotype-phenotype associations inferred with genome-wide association studies (GWAS). In this study, we explore an alternative approach to detect genetic variants with non-neutral effects by tracking temporal trends in allele frequency in a winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) breeding population over an eight-year period, from which signals of selection may be inferred. Selection signatures were inferred with a generalized linear model, where we modeled trends in allele frequency as a function of time (crossing year). These signatures of selection were used to prioritize variants. Associations between phenotypic performance and individual load of prioritized variants were then investigated. Furthermore, we assessed whether incorporating selection information into a genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) model improves model performance in terms of quality of fit and prediction ability. Our findings indicate that the inferred signals of selection are effective in identifying non-neutral variants. Variants under strong negative selection were associated with a decrease in protein content adjusted for grain yield (p-value < 0.01), while genetic variants that had been under moderate to high levels of positive selection were associated with increased grain yield (p-value < 0.01). However, incorporating selection information did not improve prediction accuracy. In conclusion, temporal trends in allele frequency can be used to detect non-neutral variants. The proposed approach may hence complement traditional quantitative genetic methods for detecting non-neutral genetic variation. This approach may allow breeders to detect non-neutral variants earlier in the breeding cycle, without resorting to phenotypic data.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
2
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
10.2%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
6.9%
4
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.5%
5
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
6
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
8
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
9
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
10
Genetics Selection Evolution
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
11
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Aquaculture
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Heredity
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
16
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
17
The Plant Phenome Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
18
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
20
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
22
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
in silico Plants
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
24
Genetic Epidemiology
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
25
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%
26
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%