Back

Guidance for high-quality functional gene embeddings from large language models

Huang, R.; Hou, Y.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, J.; Lu, J.; Kong, Y.; Xu, P.

2026-05-04 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.04.30.721875 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to generate gene embeddings, yet systematic benchmarks of prompting strategies and practical guidance for obtaining biologically meaningful representations remain limited. Here we present GEbench, an evaluation framework for assessing LLM-derived gene embeddings across different tasks, prompting strategies, and LLM architectures. GEbench revealed that embedding quality depends primarily on whether the input text contains explicit functional information, rather than on sparse gene identifiers or model size. Identifier-based embeddings showed weak biological organization, whereas embeddings derived from functional descriptions consistently achieved stronger functional separation and predictive performance. Notably, Self-Des, which extracts embeddings from model-generated gene function descriptions, enabled locally deployable LLMs to generate high-fidelity representations that approach the quality of expert-curated databases. Genome-scale analyses further supported these findings, indicating that explicit functional descriptions are an effective design principle for generating high-quality gene embeddings from LLMs.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 1%
11.9%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 25%
7.9%
3
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.1%
4
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.1%
5
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.2%
6
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.1%
7
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
8
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
10
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
11
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
12
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.5%
13
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
14
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
15
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.5%
16
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.4%
17
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
18
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
19
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.6%
21
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
22
IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.2%
24
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
25
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.1%
26
Database
51 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
27
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.7%
30
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%