Back

A Heart-on-a-Chip Microdevice with Aligned Fibers for Cardiotoxicity Assessment

Murata, K.; Abulaiti, M.; Okama, R.; Kato, K.; Tanaka, Y.; Masumoto, H.

2026-05-04 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.04.30.721826 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Background and ObjectivesCardiovascular cells differentiated from human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), including cardiomyocytes, are valuable for evaluating human cardiac pharmacology and toxicity. Early assessment of cardiotoxicity, especially for novel drugs like anticancer agents, is essential for improving drug development efficiency and reducing costs. This study aimed to develop a highly sensitive bioassay system capable of evaluating the physiological function of human cardiac tissue in vitro. MethodsHuman iPSCs were differentiated into cardiovascular cell types (cardiomyocytes, vascular endothelial cells, and vascular mural cells) and assembled into a cardiac tissue model on aligned fiber device. This tissue was cultured dynamically to induce the formation of vascular network-like structure. By combining the fiber device with our previously developed heart-on-a-chip microdevice (HMD), we created a new model of HMD (Aligned Fiber-based HMD; AF-HMD) with improved throughput and stability. Pulsatile force changes induced by drug exposure were quantified by tracking the displacement of fluorescent microbeads within the microchannels. ResultsAF-HMD demonstrated functional responses to known cardiac agonists and toxicants, such as doxorubicin. The device also replicated clinically relevant cardiotoxic events, including the synergistic effects of trastuzumab and doxorubicin, showing marked reductions in contractile force and beat rate, mirroring clinical observations. ConclusionsThe AF-HMD system provides a sensitive and reproducible platform for evaluating cardiotoxicity in drug development. It offers a promising tool for preclinical screening, with potential applications in personalized medicine and predicting cardiotoxic risk in cancer therapy.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
2
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
3
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
5
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.3%
6
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
7
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
8
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
9
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
10
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
12
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
13
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
14
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.6%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
16
Small Methods
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
17
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
18
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
19
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
Small
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
Integrative Biology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%