Back

Patient Pathways To Uganda'S First Specialised Early Intervention In Psychosis Service And Relation To Their Clinical Outcomes.

Mwesiga, E. K.; Ssembajjwe, W.; Ndigamanya, R. I.; Balinga, S.; Aujo, B. T.; Ampiire, M.; Kaddu, A. K.; SSEMATA, A. S.; Kalungi, A.; Kiguba, R.; Byamugisha, J.; Mukasa, M. K.; Sajatovic, M.; Nakasujja, N.

2026-05-01 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.04.30.26352152 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundEarly Intervention for Psychosis Services (EIPS) enhance outcomes for individuals experiencing their first episode of psychosis (FEP). However, in low-resource settings, there is limited knowledge about i) the pathways patients take to access EIPS, ii) the proportion and factors associated with acceptance of referral to EIPS, and iii) if different pathways to EIPS services affect clinical outcomes. Ugandas first EIPS, the Specialised Treatment Early in Psychosis Service at Makerere University Hospital (STEP_MaKH), presents a unique opportunity to explore these important questions. AimsWe aimed to examine the pathways to EIPS, the factors associated with referral to specialised psychosis care and the impact of initial treatment-seeking behaviour on long-term symptom remission and quality of life. MethodsWe conducted a multiple-method study. Pathways to care were assessed retrospectively using the WHO Encounter Form among adults with FEP eligible for referral to STEP_MaKH. Among those who completed referral and enrolled in STEP_MaKH. Symptom severity and quality of life were followed prospectively for 12 months. Modified Poisson regression identified predictors of referral completion. Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards models examined time to symptom remission and time to achieving a good quality of life. ResultsOf the 187 adults with first-episode psychosis eligible for referral to STEP_MaKH, Native/religious healers (n = 86) were the predominant first point of contact. Only 56 (29.9%) accepted referral to STEP_MaKH. Participants referred from Mulago National Referral Hospital more likely to enrol than those referred from Butabika (RR = 4.7; 95% CI: 2.90-7.87). Longer delays from first treatment contact were associated with reduced likelihood of reaching STEP_MaKH (RR = 0.99 per month; p = 0.041). After enrolment, symptoms improved rapidly with 60% achieving PANSS remission by Month 1, and fewer than 10% remained non-remitted by Months 2-3. In adjusted Cox models, participants initially seen by mental health workers achieved remission more quickly than those initially seen by non-medical personnel (HR = 1.48; 95% CI: 1.05-2.10). Older age was associated with slower remission (HR = 0.94; p = 0.023). Quality of life improved over the follow-up period, with earlier attainment of good quality of life among those initially managed by mental health workers. ConclusionsPathways to care for FEP in Uganda are complex and culturally mediated, with substantial attrition before specialised early psychosis care is reached. Referral completion is strongly shaped by referral site and by delays in the care pathway. Once in specialised care, clinical outcomes improve rapidly, and initial contact with mental health workers is associated with faster symptom remission and earlier gains in quality of life. Strengthening referral systems, reducing pathway delays, and developing collaborative detection-and-referral links with community and frontline providers are key priorities for optimising early psychosis outcomes in low-resource settings.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.5%
2
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.3%
4
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
5
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
6
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Schizophrenia Bulletin
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
8
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
9
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
10
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
11
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.3%
12
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
13
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
16
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
17
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
19
Schizophrenia Research
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
20
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
21
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
24
JAMA Psychiatry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
25
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
27
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%