Unmasking Disparities in Caesarean Section Utilization in Nigeria: A K-Means Cluster Analysis of Obstetric Risk Profiles Using Machine Learning Approach
AJEBORIOGBON, S. A.; Ogunetimoju, A. M.; Bisiriyu, O. L.
Show abstract
Caesarean section rates in Nigeria remain suboptimal, with significant disparities across socioeconomic and geographic strata. The objective of this research is to identify and characterize distinct obstetric risk profiles associated with caesarean section utilization in Nigeria using K-means cluster analysis, and to examine the sociodemographic and geographic factors driving these disparities. We analyzed data from 13,915 women with recent births in the 2024 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey. Fourteen variables spanning demographics, socioeconomic status, healthcare access, medical history, and geography were used as clustering features. K-Means clustering was performed with optimal cluster selection based on silhouette score, Davies Bouldin index, and Calinski Harabasz index. Bootstrap validation with 100 iterations assessed cluster stability, while chi-square tests and logistic regression examined associations between cluster membership and surgical delivery. Ten distinct clusters were identified with rates ranging from 1.7% to 14.4%, representing an 8.4-fold variation. The highest utilization cluster at 14.4% comprised urban, highly educated, wealthy women with extensive antenatal care averaging 16.5 visits, while the lowest utilization cluster at 1.7% consisted of rural, poorly educated, impoverished women with minimal healthcare access averaging 2.3 visits. Cluster membership was significantly associated with utilization, and bootstrap analysis confirmed cluster stability with a mean silhouette of 0.220. Machine learning based clustering reveals profound disparities in utilization across distinct population subgroups in Nigeria, highlighting the dual challenge of underutilization among disadvantaged rural populations and potential overutilization among urban elites. Targeted interventions addressing geographic, economic, and healthcare access barriers are essential to optimize utilization across all population segments.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification and Mitigation of High-Risk Pregnancy with the Community Maternal Danger Score Mobile Application in Gboko, Nigeria 97%
- Estimates and determinants of health facility delivery in the Birhan cohort in Ethiopia 96%
- Trends, wealth inequalities and the role of the private sector in caesarean section in the Middle East and North Africa: a repeat cross-sectional analysis of population-based surveys 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Determinants of facility-based childbirth among adolescents and young women in Guinea: a secondary analysis of the 2018 Demographic and Health Survey 96%
- The effect of health insurance coverage on antenatal care utilization in Cambodia: A secondary analysis of Cambodia Demographic and Health Survey 2021-2022 95%
- Implementation and Evaluation of Obstetric Early Warning Systems in tertiary care hospitals in Nigeria 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Informal coercion during childbirth: risk factors and prevalence estimates from a nationwide survey among women in Switzerland 94%
- Maternal and perinatal characteristics and outcomes of pregnancies complicated with COVID-19 in Kuwait 94%
- Distance matters: barriers to antenatal care and safe childbirth in a migrant population on the Thailand-Myanmar border from 2007-2015, a pregnancy cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Availability and readiness of healthcare facilities and their effects on under-five mortality in Bangladesh: Analysis of linked data 93%
- Inequities in Effective Coverage of Family Planning Services in Low-and Middle-Income Countries: Linking Households and Facility Surveys 93%
- Analyzing concordance between MUAC, MUACZ, and WHZ in diagnosing acute malnutrition among children under 5 in Somalia 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.