Back

Inequalities in early childhood developmental concerns before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic in Scotland: a retrospective cohort study

Hardie, I.; Marryat, L.; Murray, A.; King, J.; Okelo, K.; Fenton, L.; Boardman, J. P.; Wilson, P.; Wood, R. P.; Auyeung, B.

2026-05-06 health policy
10.64898/2026.04.30.26352025 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic was associated with increased child developmental concerns in Scotland. However, it is not known whether this increase was uniform across social groups, and there is particular concern that children from low-income households, urban areas and ethnic minority groups may have been disproportionately affected. This retrospective, population-based, cohort study aimed to examine whether the pandemic was associated with changes in developmental inequalities in Scotland. Study designWe linked national birth records, the COVID-19 in Pregnancy in Scotland (COPS) dataset, and 13-15 month and 27-30 month child health review records, covering all children born in Scotland who undertook reviews between January 2019 and August 2023 and had full developmental data. Logistic regression models estimated inequalities in odds of developmental concerns, before, during and after the pandemic and across Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) quintiles, parental National Statistics Socioeconomic Classification (NS-SEC), urban-rural classification, child ethnicity and child sex. Interaction analysis formally tested for any significant changes in inequalities. FindingsThe analyses included 254,367 children, covering 13-15 month child health review records for 183,439 children and 27-30 month child health review records for 184,689 children. Children in more deprived SIMD quintiles and lower parental NS-SEC categories had significantly higher odds of developmental concerns, as did African and Asian children (at 27-30 months only). Children who were female and in rural areas (27-30 months only) had significantly lower odds of developmental concerns. Developmental inequalities were broadly consistent at each time point and interaction analysis suggested that there was no widening of inequalities during or after the pandemic. ConclusionsDevelopmental inequalities in Scotland did not widen during or after the COVID-19 pandemic. However, substantial pre-existing inequalities persist, underscoring the need for interventions to reduce disparities and support national policy goals on child development.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 1%
14.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.5%
4
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.9%
7
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
8
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.1%
10
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
11
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
13
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
16
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
17
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
18
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
19
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
20
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
21
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
24
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
25
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
26
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
27
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%