Inequalities in early childhood developmental concerns before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic in Scotland: a retrospective cohort study
Hardie, I.; Marryat, L.; Murray, A.; King, J.; Okelo, K.; Fenton, L.; Boardman, J. P.; Wilson, P.; Wood, R. P.; Auyeung, B.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic was associated with increased child developmental concerns in Scotland. However, it is not known whether this increase was uniform across social groups, and there is particular concern that children from low-income households, urban areas and ethnic minority groups may have been disproportionately affected. This retrospective, population-based, cohort study aimed to examine whether the pandemic was associated with changes in developmental inequalities in Scotland. Study designWe linked national birth records, the COVID-19 in Pregnancy in Scotland (COPS) dataset, and 13-15 month and 27-30 month child health review records, covering all children born in Scotland who undertook reviews between January 2019 and August 2023 and had full developmental data. Logistic regression models estimated inequalities in odds of developmental concerns, before, during and after the pandemic and across Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) quintiles, parental National Statistics Socioeconomic Classification (NS-SEC), urban-rural classification, child ethnicity and child sex. Interaction analysis formally tested for any significant changes in inequalities. FindingsThe analyses included 254,367 children, covering 13-15 month child health review records for 183,439 children and 27-30 month child health review records for 184,689 children. Children in more deprived SIMD quintiles and lower parental NS-SEC categories had significantly higher odds of developmental concerns, as did African and Asian children (at 27-30 months only). Children who were female and in rural areas (27-30 months only) had significantly lower odds of developmental concerns. Developmental inequalities were broadly consistent at each time point and interaction analysis suggested that there was no widening of inequalities during or after the pandemic. ConclusionsDevelopmental inequalities in Scotland did not widen during or after the COVID-19 pandemic. However, substantial pre-existing inequalities persist, underscoring the need for interventions to reduce disparities and support national policy goals on child development.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Vulnerabilities in child wellbeing among primary school children: a cross-sectional study in Bradford, UK 96%
- The COVID in the Context of Pregnancy, Infancy and Parenting (CoCoPIP) Study: protocol for a longitudinal study of parental mental health, social interactions, physical growth, and cognitive development of infants during the pandemic 95%
- Prior health-related behaviours in children (2014-2020) and association with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test during adolescence (2020-2021): a retrospective cohort study using survey data linked with routine health data in Wales, UK 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Population birth outcomes in 2020 and experiences of expectant mothers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a ‘Born in Wales’ mixed methods study using routine data 95%
- Factors associated with low school readiness, a linked health and education data study in Wales, UK 95%
- Factors influencing wellbeing in young people during COVID-19: A survey with 6291 young people in Wales 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Temporal trends of key preconception indicators among women in Northern Ireland, UK: An analysis of maternity healthcare data 2011-2021 91%
- Type of treatment matters for the association between conception through medically assisted reproduction and childhood cognition: A Danish population-wide cohort study 91%
- Large differences in community COVID-19 testing across geographic areas in a Swedish region with 385,000 inhabitants 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- How to mitigate selection bias in COVID-19 surveys: evidence from five national cohorts 93%
- Ethnic differences in COVID-19 mortality during the first two waves of the Coronavirus Pandemic: a nationwide cohort study of 29 million adults in England 93%
- Community-level characteristics of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in England: A nationwide cross-sectional study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative analysis of policies and programs to support families and children during COVID-19 93%
- Interrupting the intergenerational cycle of violence: protocol for a three-generational longitudinal mixed-methods study in South Africa (INTERRUPT_VIOLENCE) 93%
- Associations of socioeconomic position and adverse childhood experiences with health-related behaviour changes and changes to employment during the first COVID-19 lockdown in the UK 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.