Back

Predicting first-onset depression in adolescents: Do general population models generalize to youth with ADHD?

Lu, S.; Wise, T.; Barch, D. M.; Hosang, G. M.; Michelini, G.

2026-05-03 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.04.30.26351304 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMost studies seeking to identify youth at increased risk for depression have developed prediction models using a limited set of risk factors in general population samples. It is unclear whether these models generalize to high-risk youth. Here, we developed machine learning algorithms to predict first-onset depression in youth from the general population and high-risk youth with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). MethodsParticipants were 4803 unrelated children from the ABCD study with no prior mood disorder and complete data at baseline (age 9-10 years) and 2-year follow-up. Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, and Elastic Net models were used to predict first-onsets from clinically-relevant risk factors spanning mental and physical health, cognitive, dispositional, interpersonal, and socio-environmental domains. Predictive performance was evaluated in the full sample and separately in participants with ADHD (N=584, 12.16%). ResultsModels trained on the full sample achieved good discriminative predictive power (area under the curve [AUC]=0.70 and accuracy=0.70-0.82). Predictors that replicated across models included earlier pubertal development, higher behavioral inhibition and aggression, and more time spent passively watching media content. In the ADHD subsample, model performance declined (AUC=0.46-0.61) and predictors only partly overlapped with those identified in the full sample. ConclusionsModels effectively predicted depression in the general population but showed poor generalization to high-risk youth with ADHD, suggesting different risk factors in this group. These findings highlight that models trained in general population samples may not generalize to high-risk groups, pointing to the need for more tailored efforts to predict depression in youth at increased risk.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.