Back

Predicting first-onset depression in adolescents: Do general population models generalize to youth with ADHD?

Lu, S.; Wise, T.; Barch, D. M.; Hosang, G. M.; Michelini, G.

2026-05-03 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.04.30.26351304 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMost studies seeking to identify youth at increased risk for depression have developed prediction models using a limited set of risk factors in general population samples. It is unclear whether these models generalize to high-risk youth. Here, we developed machine learning algorithms to predict first-onset depression in youth from the general population and high-risk youth with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). MethodsParticipants were 4803 unrelated children from the ABCD study with no prior mood disorder and complete data at baseline (age 9-10 years) and 2-year follow-up. Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, and Elastic Net models were used to predict first-onsets from clinically-relevant risk factors spanning mental and physical health, cognitive, dispositional, interpersonal, and socio-environmental domains. Predictive performance was evaluated in the full sample and separately in participants with ADHD (N=584, 12.16%). ResultsModels trained on the full sample achieved good discriminative predictive power (area under the curve [AUC]=0.70 and accuracy=0.70-0.82). Predictors that replicated across models included earlier pubertal development, higher behavioral inhibition and aggression, and more time spent passively watching media content. In the ADHD subsample, model performance declined (AUC=0.46-0.61) and predictors only partly overlapped with those identified in the full sample. ConclusionsModels effectively predicted depression in the general population but showed poor generalization to high-risk youth with ADHD, suggesting different risk factors in this group. These findings highlight that models trained in general population samples may not generalize to high-risk groups, pointing to the need for more tailored efforts to predict depression in youth at increased risk.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
13.9%
2
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.1%
3
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
4
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.1%
5
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
6
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
7
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
8
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
9
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
10
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
11
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
12
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
13
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
14
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
15
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.8%
17
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
18
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
19
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
20
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.6%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.3%
22
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
23
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
25
European Neuropsychopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
26
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
American Journal of Psychiatry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
29
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
30
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%