Back

Automatic Bevacizumab Response Prediction in Ovarian Cancer from Digital Pathology Images via Novel AI-based Computational Pipeline

Alsaiari, A.; Turki, T.; Taguchi, Y.-h.

2026-05-04 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.04.29.721782 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Ovarian cancer is one of the gynecological cancer types, which, if metastasized and not detected early, can cause deaths among women. Therefore, there is a need to accurately predict drug responses to ovarian cancer. A gynecological pathologist inspects abnormality in tissues, followed by providing a report about patients; however, such a diagnostic process is (1) hard; (2) requires experience; and (3) time consuming. Moreover, existing tools are far from perfect. Hence, we present a computational pipeline to improve predicting drug response pertaining to ovarian cancer, derived as follows. First, we download digital pathology images pertaining to ovarian bevacizumab response from the cancer imaging archive repository. We employed histogram of oriented gradients to images, constructing feature vectors, provided to Fisher linear discriminant analysis to change the representation through dimensionality reduction. Then, we provide reduced-dimensionality data for regression analysis through support vector regression coupled with various kernels and calculating the area under the ROC curve (AUC). Experimental results against transformer-based models (ViT and Swin) and other deep learning (DL) models (VGG16, ResNet50, InceptionV3, MobileNetV2, and EfficientNetB6) demonstrate that our approach with radial kernel (named SVRD+R) yielded an AUC performance improvements of 17% against the best-performing transformer-based model (ViT) while obtaining an AUC performance improvements of 14.9% when compared against the best DL-based model (MobileNetV2). These results demonstrate the superiority and feasibility of our AI-based pipeline when tackling prediction problems pertaining to gynecologic cancer studies. MSC92B05; 68T09

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 3%
9.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 22%
5.0%
4
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
5
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
6
Journal of Pathology Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.7%
8
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.7%
9
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
10
Neurocomputing
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
11
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.8%
50% of probability mass above
13
Expert Systems with Applications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
14
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
17
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.4%
18
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
19
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
20
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
21
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
22
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
23
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
24
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
25
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
26
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
27
Journal of Computational Biology
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
28
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Gigabyte
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
30
Applied Sciences
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%