Back

Vascular tree structure-based perfusion phantom fabrication using modified Hele-Shaw Cell technique

Das, S.; Rakshe, M.; Sarkar, S.; Paul, R.; Marathe, S. D.; Abraham, N. M.; Gandhi, P. S.; Varma, H. M.

2026-05-03 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.04.29.721575 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Tissue phantoms that mimic microvasculature and perfusion are essential for modelling vascular function, guiding interventions, and calibrating imaging systems, which require faithful replication of vascular geometry and flow. Conventional fabrication strategies, including wire-based molding, lithographic micromachining, and additive manufacturing, offer useful capabilities but remain constrained by predefined designs, rectangular channel cross-sections, limited scalability, and high production costs. Reliance on predefined digital vascular models restricts design flexibility and limits the ability to capture the natural variability and complexity of real vascular systems. Here, we present a lithography-free, fractal-generating approach based on a modified Lifted Hele-Shaw Cell (LHSC) technique, in which vascular networks emerge spontaneously via interfacial fluid instabilities. Unlike pre-designed methods, these structures are governed by fluid properties and flow conditions, enabling adaptive, physiologically relevant geometries with smooth Gaussian cross-sections and natural diameter tapering. We demonstrate four phantom designs: a planar vascular tree, an anatomically guided cerebral network, a retinal vascular model, and a conformable curved substrate phantom. Validation using Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging confirms structural fidelity and physiologically relevant flow consistent with Murrays law. This platform uniquely integrates realistic vascular architecture with emergent, fractal driven formation, highlighting its potential as a reproducible and biologically relevant alternative to conventional vascular phantom fabrication. Furthermore, the availability of such realistic in vitro vascular models can reduce reliance on animal experiments and contribute towards more ethical and sustainable preclinical research.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.2%
2
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.5%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.3%
4
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
5
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.9%
6
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
7
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
8
Photoacoustics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
11
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
12
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
14
Small Methods
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
15
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.9%
16
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
18
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
19
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
20
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
21
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
22
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
23
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
24
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
25
Optica
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
26
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
28
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
29
Journal of Controlled Release
39 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
30
Small
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%