Back

Development and evaluation of a pan-fungal lateral flow device for the rapid identification of pathogen class in microbial keratitis

Fingerhut, L.; Duncan, S.; Mills, B.

2026-04-30 microbiology
10.64898/2026.04.29.721399 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeTo develop a pan-fungal lateral flow device (LFD); evaluating device performance with samples obtained from ex vivo porcine cornea infection models. MethodsFungal {beta}-glucan (PF1), human CLEC7A/Dectin-1/CLECSF12 protein (Fc Tag; PF2), and fungal melanin (PF3) antibodies were evaluated for binding to clinically relevant fungal and bacterial species (Aspergillus flavus, Fusarium keratoplasticum, Candida albicans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus) by immunofluorescence staining. PF1 and PF2 were evaluated in proof-of-concept, in-house LFD strips using cultured pathogens and ex vivo porcine corneal infection samples. The lead antibody (PF1) was validated in a commercially-developed prototype LFD. ResultsPF1 and PF2 discriminated target fungi from bacteria by immunofluorescence microscopy and in-house LFD strips. The lead candidate PF1 demonstrated good sensitivity (0.75) and specificity (0.94) with cultured fungal hyphae. Samples obtained from infected ex vivo cornea by clinically relevant methods confirmed excellent sensitivity (scrapes: 1.00, swabs: 0.94) and specificity (scrapes: 1.00, swabs: 0.83). The commercially-developed PF1-LFD prototype achieved perfect sensitivity (1.00) and specificity (1.00) when detecting and discriminating fungi from non-fungal ex vivo corneal swab samples. ConclusionsFeasibility of pan-fungal LFD application in microbial keratitis diagnosis was demonstrated - using {beta}-glucan as a pan-fungal target and a clinically relevant microbial keratitis ex vivo model. LFDs were able to differentiate fungal from bacterial samples, detect antigen present in corneal swabs, and provide a read-out within 20 minutes. Sensitivity and specificity values are comparable to currently used diagnostic tests. Translational RelevanceEarly discrimination of fungal keratitis cases is important to adapt treatment, and improve patient outcome.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.5%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.1%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.1%
4
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.0%
5
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.0%
6
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.1%
7
Translational Vision Science & Technology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
8
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
9
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
10
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
11
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
12
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
13
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
14
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.5%
16
Journal of Microbiological Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
17
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
18
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
20
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
25
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
26
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
27
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
28
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
29
The Analyst
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
30
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.7%