Back

An intersectional study of poverty, migration, and treatment seeking behaviour on antimicrobial use in a semi-urban area in Tamil Nadu, India

Gopichandran, V.; Muralidharan, N.; Chandrasekaran, J.; Sinthiya, D. D.; Subramaniam, S.; Thiagesan, R.; Ranjith, J.

2026-05-01 health systems and quality improvement
10.64898/2026.04.29.26352106 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundUnderstanding antimicrobial use and factors driving it in communities is essential to devise its stewardship and reduce emergence of antimicrobial resistance. ObjectivesTo study the intersectional influence of socioeconomic status, migration and place of treatment on antimicrobial use in a semi urban area in Tamil Nadu, India. MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey among systematically sampled 525 adult men and women from three villages in a semi-urban area in Tiruvallur district. We collected data through structured interviews on incidence of infections in the past 3 months, treatment seeking behaviour, and audited the antimicrobial prescription or empty packs of medicines used. We analyzed the data using R statistical software and performed a multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy to study intersectional effects. ResultsWe found that the incidence of infection syndrome was 37% with a majority of them being acute respiratory infections. 143 of them sought treatment, with 40% going to a private general practitioner. People belonging to middle class had a 3.7 times greater odds of going to private sector compared to lower class. Twenty eight (19.6%) of those who sought treatment received an antimicrobial prescription. Sixty percent of them belonged to Access group, 35.7% Watch and 3.6% Restrict group. There was a significant intersectional effect showing middle class- non migrant - private care seekers having 22% probability of antimicrobial use versus lower class - migrant - government care seekers having 16% probability. The variance partition coefficient was 2.6% showing a small by significant portion of the variance contributed by intersectional identities. ConclusionAntimicrobial use in the community is significantly shaped by the intersection of socioeconomic status, migrant status and place of seeking care for the infection. Regulation of private sector prescription patterns and improving access to health care for migrants are key policy interventions.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 10%
17.9%
2
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
13.8%
3
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.7%
4
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
5
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.1%
7
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.1%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.5%
9
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.0%
10
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
11
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.6%
13
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
14
Tropical Medicine & International Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
15
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
16
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
18
Journal of Infection and Public Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
19
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 77%
0.7%
21
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
22
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
23
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%