Global burden of foreign bodies and impact of COVID-19 pandemic
Simayi, F.
Show abstract
BackgroundForeign bodies (FBs) can cause obstruction, infection, or injury, yet comprehensive global assessments remain limited. This study evaluated the burden of FBs from 1990-2021, projected trends to 2050, and identified high-risk populations. MethodsUsing Global Burden of Disease 2021 data, we estimated age-standardized incidence ratio (ASIR), death ratio (ASDR), and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) by age, sex, and region. Temporal trends were assessed with estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) and Joinpoint regression; projections applied Bayesian age-period-cohort models; decomposition quantified the effects of aging, population, and epidemiological change. ResultsFrom 1990-2021, global ASIR declined from 660.75 to 561.16 per 100,000 (EAPC: -0.84), ASDR from 2.11 to 1.41 (-1.47), and DALYs from 145.14 to 77.87 (- 2.13). Males had consistently higher burden (2021: 725.96 versus 394.11 per 100,000 in females). Children under 5 and adults over 80 bore the highest risks, with intraocular FBs dominating incidence and pulmonary aspiration/airway FBs driving mortality. Western Europe had the highest ASIR, Andean Latin America the highest ASDR. Since 2019, the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, intraocular FBs incidence has surged in East Asia, mainly China. Projections suggest ASIR will continue to rise through 2050, while ASDR and DALYs continue to decline, driven by global population growth (187.27%) and aging (46.82%) but offset by epidemiological improvements (-134.09%). ConclusionsDespite long-term declines, FB incidence is rebounding, with marked disparities across sex, age, and region. Targeted interventions, including workplace safety, pediatric and geriatric care, and region-specific policies, are needed to mitigate risks and reduce inequalities.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Disparities in the pace of biological aging among midlife adults of the same chronological age have implications for future frailty risk and policy 90%
- Integration of polygenic and gut metagenomic risk prediction for common diseases 88%
- The Genetic Architecture of Biological Age in Nine Human Organ Systems 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- How many are at increased risk of severe COVID-19 disease? Rapid global, regional and national estimates for 2020 92%
- Serological evidence of human infection with SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis 90%
- Global state of deworming coverage and inequity in low-income and middle-income countries: a spatiotemporal study of household health surveys 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The demographic and geographic impact of the COVID pandemic in Bulgaria and Eastern Europe in 2020 93%
- “What’s in a name?”: Using mpox as a case study to understand the importance of communication, advocacy, and information accuracy in disease nomenclature 92%
- Colder and drier winter conditions are associated with greater SARS-CoV-2 transmission: a regional study of the first epidemic wave in north-west hemisphere countries 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Country differences in transmissibility, age distribution and case-fatality of SARS-CoV-2: a global ecological analysis 91%
- Monitoring for outbreak associated excess mortality in an African city: Detection limits in Antananarivo, Madagascar 91%
- Estimates of the global burden of Congenital Rubella Syndrome, 1996-2019 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Stay-at-home and face mask policies intentions inconsistent with incidence and fatality during US COVID-19 pandemic 90%
- Using Satellite Images and Deep Learning to Identify Associations Between County-Level Mortality and Residential Neighborhood Features Proximal to Schools: A Cross-Sectional Study 89%
- Early surveillance and public health emergency disposal measures between novel coronavirus disease 2019 and avian influenza in China: a case-comparison study 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.