Back

Global burden of foreign bodies and impact of COVID-19 pandemic

Simayi, F.

2026-04-30 health policy
10.64898/2026.04.29.26352072 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundForeign bodies (FBs) can cause obstruction, infection, or injury, yet comprehensive global assessments remain limited. This study evaluated the burden of FBs from 1990-2021, projected trends to 2050, and identified high-risk populations. MethodsUsing Global Burden of Disease 2021 data, we estimated age-standardized incidence ratio (ASIR), death ratio (ASDR), and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) by age, sex, and region. Temporal trends were assessed with estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) and Joinpoint regression; projections applied Bayesian age-period-cohort models; decomposition quantified the effects of aging, population, and epidemiological change. ResultsFrom 1990-2021, global ASIR declined from 660.75 to 561.16 per 100,000 (EAPC: -0.84), ASDR from 2.11 to 1.41 (-1.47), and DALYs from 145.14 to 77.87 (- 2.13). Males had consistently higher burden (2021: 725.96 versus 394.11 per 100,000 in females). Children under 5 and adults over 80 bore the highest risks, with intraocular FBs dominating incidence and pulmonary aspiration/airway FBs driving mortality. Western Europe had the highest ASIR, Andean Latin America the highest ASDR. Since 2019, the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, intraocular FBs incidence has surged in East Asia, mainly China. Projections suggest ASIR will continue to rise through 2050, while ASDR and DALYs continue to decline, driven by global population growth (187.27%) and aging (46.82%) but offset by epidemiological improvements (-134.09%). ConclusionsDespite long-term declines, FB incidence is rebounding, with marked disparities across sex, age, and region. Targeted interventions, including workplace safety, pediatric and geriatric care, and region-specific policies, are needed to mitigate risks and reduce inequalities.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 5%
23.9%
2
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.6%
3
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.7%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
6
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
7
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
8
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
9
Nature Aging
51 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.2%
10
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.9%
11
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
12
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
13
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
14
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
15
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
16
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
17
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
The Innovation
12 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 48%
0.5%
21
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
22
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%