Back

Autism Sensory Profiles Predict Stimulus-Evoked Insula Connectivity

Jacokes, Z.; Beeler-Duden, S.; Lawson, S.; Eilbott, J.; Van Horn, J. D.; Pelphrey, K.; GENDAAR Research Consortium,

2026-04-30 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.04.29.26352062 medRxiv
Show abstract

Sensory processing is a common target in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) research, yet the latent structure of sensory experience is disputed. Researchers frequently explore the presence of "subtypes" to categorize sensory heterogeneity, but such discrete models can fail to capture the intrinsic geometry of phenotypic data. In this study, we aim to characterize heterogeneous sensory profiles in ASD and explore if the same characterization can describe neurobiological function. First, we apply unsupervised spectral manifold dimensionality reduction to item-level Sensory Profile data from a large cohort of autistic participants (n=223) to compare categorical subtyping against continuous models. The behavioral results reveal unstable and irreproducible subtyping solutions; instead, sensory processing differences are best characterized as a continuous, non-linear manifold of sensory severity. To determine the neurobiological relevance of this sensory gradient, we employed voxel-wise linear mixed-effects modeling of insula-seeded functional connectivity (n=63). We demonstrate that sensory severity predicts a significant decoupling between the insula and sensorimotor cortices during externally driven stimulation involving motion stimuli, but not during resting state. This finding supports the interpretation that sensory-related neural hypoconnectivity is context-dependent and not reflective of intrinsic traits. Further, we identify a significant sex-by-sensory gradient interaction, indicating heightened sensitivity of connectivity patterns to sensory severity in autistic males. These findings indicate that sensory atypicality in ASD points toward a continuous regulatory manifold linked to disrupted social-sensory integration.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
17.9%
2
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 1%
11.9%
3
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.6%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.6%
5
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.1%
6
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 28%
3.5%
9
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
10
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 7%
3.5%
11
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
12
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
13
Cerebral Cortex Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
14
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.8%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.8%
17
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
18
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.6%
19
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
20
Molecular Autism
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.9%
22
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Journal of Neuroscience Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
25
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
81 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%