Back

Immune Subtypes and Survival in Patients with Primary Glioma

Fang, Y.; Kim, J.; Thompson, Z. J.; Kim, Y.; Ravi, H.; Mazin, A. M.; Moran-Segura, C. M.; Nguyen, J. V.; Macaulay, R. J.; Veglia, F.; Thompson, R. C.; Chowdhary, S. A.; Egan, K. M.; Raghunand, N.

2026-04-30 oncology
10.64898/2026.04.29.26351981 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundGliomas are heterogeneous tumors with poor outcomes following current therapies, including immunotherapy. The tumor microenvironment (TME) is a critical determinant of therapeutic response in gliomas. We have classified the immune TME of gliomas by multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF). MethodsTissue taken at initial resection from 354 patients with newly-diagnosed glioma grades 2-4 were analyzed using three mIF panels of markers for T, B, and myeloid cells. Tumor cores were characterized by the relative abundances of: (i) 15 primary immune phenotypes, (ii) 96 secondary immune phenotypes, and, (iii) 29 biologically meaningful multi-marker immune phenotypes. ResultsUsing unsupervised cluster analysis of WHO grade 4 gliomas we identified four subtypes , {beta}, {gamma}, and {delta} that were internally reproducible. Immune subtype was characterized by high abundance of antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and low levels of MHC II- monocytes. Subtype {beta} was high in regulatory T cells and myeloid cells, but low in lymphocytes with effector functions. Subtype {gamma} displayed high abundance of immune cell phenotypes, particularly lymphocytes with effector or helper functions. Subtype {delta} was low in lymphoid and myeloid immune phenotypes and APCs, with poorer outcomes. Grade 3 tumors could also be classified into , {beta}, {gamma}, and {delta} subtypes, indicating generalizability of these immune TME subtypes across high grade gliomas. ConclusionsWe have identified internally reproducible criteria for classifying gliomas according to the immune microenvironment, findings that could aid our understanding of the natural progression of low- and high-grade gliomas and inform the rational application of immune-oncologic therapeutic interventions.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
75 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
2
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
3
Neuro-Oncology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.8%
4
OncoImmunology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
5
Neuro-Oncology Advances
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.4%
7
Cancer Cell
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
8
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.3%
9
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.4%
11
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.4%
12
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
13
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.5%
15
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Acta Neuropathologica
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
17
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
19
Acta Neuropathologica Communications
89 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.8%
22
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%