Back

The New York Genome Center ALS Consortium resource combines postmortem tissue transcriptomics with whole genome sequencing to empower biological discovery

Humphrey, J.; Oku, A.; Byrska-Bishop, M.; Basile, A.; Evani, U. S.; Corvelo, A.; Tokolyi, A.; BP, K.; Real, A.; Kim, Y.; Bond, M.; Clarke, W. E.; Fu, R.; Geiger, H.; Chang, S.; Naito, T.; Jang, B.; Musunuri, R.; Dredge, W.; Al-Abri, R.; Hoover, B. N.; Manaa, D.; McClintock, J.; Singh, F. P.; Pedersen, M. H.; Runnels, A.; Propp, N.; Fennessey, S.; Won, H.-H.; Zody, M. C.; Narzisi, G.; Robine, N.; Lappalainen, T.; Fagegaltier, D.; Gursoy, G.; Knowles, D. A.; Raj, T.; NYGC ALS Consortium, ; Harms, M. B.; Phatnani, H.

2026-05-04 neurology
10.64898/2026.04.29.26350889 medRxiv
Show abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a devastating neurodegenerative disease with substantial genetic and clinical heterogeneity that impedes therapeutic development. Large-scale multi-tissue genomic resources have transformed the study of neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative diseases, but no equivalent resource exists for ALS. Here we present the full NYGC ALS Consortium dataset, combining whole-genome sequencing from 4,746 donors and bulk RNA-seq from 2,574 samples across 8 brain and spinal cord regions from 695 donors across the ALS disease spectrum. Our catalogue of small variants, structural variants, and short tandem repeats identified likely pathogenic mutations in 15.6% of ALS cases. Gene expression and mRNA splicing analysis across 5 major tissues reveals shared and region-specific features, highlighting microglial and T-cell dysregulation in the spinal cord. Mapping the genetic regulation of expression and splicing across tissues identified associations with 6 ALS risk loci, whereas allele-specific rare variant analysis detected expression effects for C9orf72 and OPTN. All data are immediately publicly available.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.