Back

Barriers and facilitators to implementing social prescribing in child and adolescent mental health services: a qualitative analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

Bradbury, A.; Han, E.; Burton, A.; Hayes, D.; Wright, J.; Stuttard, H.; Page, J.; Sticpewich, L.; Fancourt, D.

2026-04-29 health systems and quality improvement
10.64898/2026.04.29.26349161 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionInterventions are urgently needed for young people waiting for Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) in England. Long waits can worsen mental health, increase distress for young people and families, and place additional pressure on already stretched services. Social prescribing, a referral system for connecting individuals with resources in the community via one-to-one support from a link worker, has not been routinely implemented or evaluated for young people on CAMHS waitlists. It remains unclear whether, and under what conditions, social prescribing can be implemented successfully within CAMHS. MethodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 23 staff and link workers involved in implementing social prescribing at 11 CAMHS sites across England as part of a large hybrid type II implementation-effectiveness study. We used a framework analysis approach, deriving the coding from the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). ResultsBarriers and facilitators mapped to 12 CFIR constructs, generating 26 themes. Key areas included: the challenges of implementing a non-medical intervention in a clinical environment; the advantage of social prescribing compared to little waitlist support; the need for flexibility in mode, duration, and frequency of sessions; the importance of community assets, funding and external partnerships for delivery; and the capacity, skills, and professional experience of link workers and staff. Barriers within CAMHS related to limited resources and partial understanding of the intervention, as well as difficulties in integrating link workers and providing supervision. Successful implementation depended on tailoring the intervention to the needs and preferences of young people and parents. Alternative social prescribing pathways were proposed, with schools being recommended as a promising setting for preventive delivery or post-treatment transitions for young people. ConclusionYouth social prescribing for young people on CAMHS waitlists is feasible but requires careful implementation. Successful delivery depends on the capacity of link workers and supportive organisational structures in CAMHS. Alternative pathways, including delivery outside the waitlist through schools may facilitate its implementation and impact.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.3%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.6%
3
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
4
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.1%
5
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
7
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
9
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
10
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
12
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
14
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
15
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
16
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
17
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
18
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
23
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%