Barriers and facilitators to implementing social prescribing in child and adolescent mental health services: a qualitative analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
Bradbury, A.; Han, E.; Burton, A.; Hayes, D.; Wright, J.; Stuttard, H.; Page, J.; Sticpewich, L.; Fancourt, D.
Show abstract
IntroductionInterventions are urgently needed for young people waiting for Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) in England. Long waits can worsen mental health, increase distress for young people and families, and place additional pressure on already stretched services. Social prescribing, a referral system for connecting individuals with resources in the community via one-to-one support from a link worker, has not been routinely implemented or evaluated for young people on CAMHS waitlists. It remains unclear whether, and under what conditions, social prescribing can be implemented successfully within CAMHS. MethodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 23 staff and link workers involved in implementing social prescribing at 11 CAMHS sites across England as part of a large hybrid type II implementation-effectiveness study. We used a framework analysis approach, deriving the coding from the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). ResultsBarriers and facilitators mapped to 12 CFIR constructs, generating 26 themes. Key areas included: the challenges of implementing a non-medical intervention in a clinical environment; the advantage of social prescribing compared to little waitlist support; the need for flexibility in mode, duration, and frequency of sessions; the importance of community assets, funding and external partnerships for delivery; and the capacity, skills, and professional experience of link workers and staff. Barriers within CAMHS related to limited resources and partial understanding of the intervention, as well as difficulties in integrating link workers and providing supervision. Successful implementation depended on tailoring the intervention to the needs and preferences of young people and parents. Alternative social prescribing pathways were proposed, with schools being recommended as a promising setting for preventive delivery or post-treatment transitions for young people. ConclusionYouth social prescribing for young people on CAMHS waitlists is feasible but requires careful implementation. Successful delivery depends on the capacity of link workers and supportive organisational structures in CAMHS. Alternative pathways, including delivery outside the waitlist through schools may facilitate its implementation and impact.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- What support do frontline workers want? A qualitative study of health and social care workers’ experiences and views of psychosocial support during the COVID-19 pandemic 96%
- Capturing the experiences of UK healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structural topic modelling analysis of 7,412 free-text survey responses 96%
- Service user experiences and views regarding telemental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a co-produced framework analysis 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sources of Stress and Coping Mechanisms: Experiences of Maternal Health Care Providers in Western Kenya 94%
- Evaluating the implementation of weekly rifapentine-isoniazid (3HP) for tuberculosis prevention among people living with HIV in Uganda: A qualitative evaluation of the 3HP Options Trial 94%
- Stakeholder perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to integrating cardiovascular disease and diabetes management at primary care in Kenya 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trauma informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs 94%
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 94%
- Challenges of visibility and inclusion in Long COVID: a population-based interview study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring High Mortality Rates Among People With Multiple And Complex Needs: A Qualitative Study Using Peer Research Methods 97%
- The psychosocial impact on frontline health and social care professionals in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study 96%
- “You’re just there, alone in your room with your thoughts” A qualitative study about the impact of lockdown among young people during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementing an Advance Choice Documents resource for Black African and Caribbean people with experience of compulsory psychiatric admission 97%
- Clinician views on best practice community care for people with complex emotional needs and how it can be achieved: a qualitative study 97%
- Service user perspectives of community mental health services for people with complex emotional needs: a co-produced qualitative interview study 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.