Back

MSK-Morph: An automated framework to systematically morph landmark-defined musculoskeletal models into subject-specific bone geometries

Cueto Fernandez, J.; van de Steeg-Henzen, C.; Schouten, A. C.; Seth, A.; van der Kruk, E.

2026-05-01 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.04.28.721455 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Musculoskeletal models are widely used to study human movement, investigate musculoskeletal disorders and evaluate athletic performance. The accuracy of these models depends primarily on representing subject-specific musculoskeletal geometry, which determines joint definitions and muscle paths. Subject-specific models can be derived from medical imaging, however the task remains labour-intensive with numerous subjective decisions, which limits their reproducibility and use in large-scale studies. Automated methods that preserve anatomical model topology while adapting models to individual bone geometries are therefore needed. Here, we develop and demonstrate a landmark-based morphing framework, MSK-Morph, to systematically transform template musculoskeletal models into subject-specific models based on bone geometry derived from medical imaging. MSK-Morph introduces an anatomical landmark-defined musculoskeletal model that embeds segment and joint definitions, and muscle paths, and uses them to systematically and reproducibly morph the model to target bone geometries. MSK-Morph automatically updates the joint definitions and muscle paths to reflect inter-individual skeletal variation while maintaining the structural topology of the original model. MSK-Morph produces landmark-defined musculoskeletal models that remain compatible with existing simulation workflows. By enabling rapid generation of models with subject-specific skeletal geometry, this framework facilitates large-scale musculoskeletal modelling and the development of more diverse generic model libraries.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.3%
3
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.6%
8
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.8%
9
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
10
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
11
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
13
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
15
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
16
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
17
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
18
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
20
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
21
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Bone
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
24
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
25
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
27
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.7%
29
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
30
Plant Phenomics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%