Back

Enhancing the Understanding of Environmental Microbiomes through Topic Modeling: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis

Kujat, A. S.; Hassenrück, C.; Lüdtke, S.; Labrenz, M.; Sperlea, T.

2026-05-01 ecology
10.64898/2026.04.28.721390 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundUnderstanding ecosystem dynamics is essential for assessing ecosystem health, yet remains challenging due to complex biotic and abiotic interactions. Microbial communities are valuable indicators of environmental change, but the high dimensionality of microbiome data requires advanced analytical methods. This study explores the use of topic modeling (TM), an unsupervised machine learning approach initially designed for text analysis, to analyze microbiome data from the dynamic Warnow Estuary on the southern Baltic Sea coast. ResultsWe applied TM to estuarine microbiome data and compared its performance to traditional dimensionality reduction methods, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA). Quantitative results indicate that TM performs comparably to conventional approaches in preserving ecological and functional information, and in certain aspects even superior. In addition, we show qualitatively that NNMF, a TM method, captures latent patterns in the data providing an interpretable perspective on the microbiome. In this exploratory framework, NNMF suggested five distinct sub-communities within the estuary that appear to follow a seasonal succession influenced by freshwater inflow. These sub-communities were associated with specific ranges of salinity and temperature and showed distinct taxonomic profiles, with shared characteristics across the estuarine system. ConclusionsOur findings suggest that TM is a useful tool for exploring complex environmental microbiome datasets, offering a complementary perspective that can provide additional ecological insights. TMs ability to highlight coherent microbial community patterns indicates its promise for supporting environmental monitoring and informing targeted ecosystem management in dynamic habitats, though further studies are needed to fully assess its applicability.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 6%
23.1%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.3%
3
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
4
Environmental DNA
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
5
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.7%
6
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
7
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.1%
9
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
10
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
11
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
15
Microbial Ecology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
16
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
17
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Limnology and Oceanography: Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
19
Environmental Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
20
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Animal Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
22
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Applied Sciences
24 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
26
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
27
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
BMC Research Notes
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
30
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%