Back

Genome-wide association study and genomic prediction of lucerne traits shaping living mulch performance

El Ghazzal, Z.; Pegard, M.; Guacaneme, M.; Surault, F.; Arcia-Ruiz, I.; Julier, B.

2026-04-30 plant biology
10.64898/2026.04.28.721352 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Lucerne is gaining interest as a living mulch in agroecological productions. However, its vigorous growth can lead to competition with cash crops for light and nutrients, necessitating new ideotypes. This study investigated the genetic basis of traits relevant to ideotype breeding: dormancy, spring regrowth, height, growth habit, leaflet size, stem diameter, and plant structure. Individuals from a diversity panel of 27 accessions and a synthetic population were phenotyped in a spaced plant nursery. Over 100,000 SNP markers were used for genotyping. Genome-wide association study (GWAS) and genomic prediction were conducted, considering population structure. Heritability estimates ranged from moderate to high in diversity panel (h{superscript 2} = 0.36-0.70) but were lower in synthetic population (h{superscript 2} = 0.17-0.33), reflecting reduced genetic variance. Trait correlations differed markedly between populations, indicating the possibility of recombining traits to create new ideotypes. GWAS identified a few QTL (r{superscript 2} up to 0.27) for leaflet size, height, growth habit, and plant structure, with candidate genes linked to growth, stress response, and signalling pathways. Genomic prediction was highly accurate in diversity panel, where broad genetic variation allowed reliable estimation of marker effects, with prediction accuracies exceeding 0.8 for heritable traits, including growth habit and leaflet size. In contrast, accuracies were low in synthetic population, reflecting its limited diversity and small size, whether training was based on the synthetic population itself or on the diversity panel. These results highlight the potential to recombine traits and develop lucerne ideotypes using molecular tools such as QTL detection and genomic prediction.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.7%
2
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.2%
3
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
4
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.9%
5
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.0%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.7%
10
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
11
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
12
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
The Plant Phenome Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
15
AoB PLANTS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
16
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
17
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
19
Annals of Botany
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
20
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
21
Plant Science
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
22
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
25
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Physiologia Plantarum
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
27
Plant Methods
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%