Back

Heartbeat-locked auditory deviations slow down cardiac activity

Koroma, M.; Nguy, K.; Pelentritou, A.; De Lucia, M.; Demertzi, A.

2026-04-30 physiology
10.64898/2026.04.28.721302 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Our responses to environmental inputs depend on the variations of our own physiological activity. However, the mechanisms by which the integration of sensory information with interoceptive signals shape bodily responses to external events remain debated. In this pre-registered study, we hypothesized three possible mechanisms underlying such exteroceptive-interoceptive integration: cardiac surprise, active inference, and dynamic coupling. To test them, we implemented a closed-loop stimulation procedure to play auditory deviations from sequences either synchronized or not with heartbeats which varied in type (omissions or rare tones) and predictability (random or regular intervals). First, we replicated previous findings that cardiac activity slows down in response to sound omissions only when sounds are synchronized with heartbeats. Second, we showed that this effect extends to rare tones, excluding the dynamic coupling hypothesis. Third, we demonstrated that these responses do not depend on the predictability of auditory deviations, excluding both cardiac surprise and active inference hypotheses. In a control experiment, we further observed that behavioral responses depend on the type and predictability of auditory deviants: participants can discriminate subjectively which sounds were synchronized with their own heartbeats without evidence of a relationship to interoception nor cardiac responses. Overall, these results demonstrate that auditory deviations slow down cardiac responses when locked to heartbeats but independently from their type and regularity, calling for novel hypotheses to account for the interoceptive-exteroceptive integration of sensory signals into cardiac activity. Impact statementUsing a cardio-audio synchrony task, we show that cardiac responses slow down upon heartbeat-locked auditory deviations independently from their type or regularity, suggesting a simple, fundamental mechanism of integration of internal and external signals into bodily responses to the environment. The heart may provide a straightforward way to study basic self-related processes, without depending on behavior or self-report, which is especially valuable for individuals who are unable to respond or communicate.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
22.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.2%
3
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.4%
4
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
5
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.3%
6
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
8
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 25%
2.6%
10
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.9%
11
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
12
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
13
International Journal of Psychophysiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
16
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
18
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
19
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
21
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
22
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
23
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
24
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
Psychophysiology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
26
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
29
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.7%
30
European Journal of Applied Physiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%