Back

Age, sex, and vendor contributions to variance in Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) 'Big Data

Simard, N.; Noseworthy, M. D.

2026-04-30 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.04.28.721286 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the contributions of age, sex, and MRI vendor to variance in Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) metrics, with a focus on understanding the impact of these factors in large-scale healthy brain datasets. A dataset of 2,700 DTI scans from healthy controls across multiple sites and MRI vendors was analyzed. The DTI scalar metrics fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) were processed and the influence of age, sex, vendor, and brain atlas selection were determined. A statistical analysis was conducted and revealed significant (p<0.05) age-related differences in DTI metrics, with older participants showing reduced FA and increased MD, in line with known microstructural changes. Sex differences were observed, with females exhibiting slightly higher FA and lower MD in certain brain regions. Vendor variability was also noted, with all three MRI vendors showing significant differences in FA with Siemens machines typically exhibiting higher FA values and GE machines lower FA values (i.e. FASiemens > FAPhilips > FAGE). Atlas selection also highlighted some specific ROI behaviour (e.g. tapetum of the corpus callosum) as one of the most significant regions of interest (ROIs) in the JHU-Tracts atlas that demonstrated a large amount of deterioration with age, particularly in females. These findings emphasize the need to account for biological factors such as age and sex, as well as technical factors like ROI selection and MRI vendor, when interpreting DTI data. The results demonstrate the potential of large-scale, multi-vendor datasets to uncover meaningful biological trends, while also addressing the challenges of scanner-specific variability. Although previous work has shown sex and age differences, this is the first large scale DTI analysis that has included age, sex, and MRI vendor as sources of variance in one model.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.0%
2
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
14.0%
3
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 1%
9.0%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.7%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.2%
7
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
8
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
9
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
10
Aperture Neuro
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
11
Brain Structure and Function
83 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
13
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
14
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
16
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
17
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
NMR in Biomedicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
19
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Brain Connectivity
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
24
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.6%
25
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%