Back

Genomic diversity of elm trees for future treescapes

Vatanparast, M.; Webber, J.; Brasier, C.; Martin, J. A.; Buggs, R. J. A.

2026-05-01 plant biology
10.64898/2026.04.28.720590 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIDutch elm disease has devastated the treescapes of Europe and North America, causing large elm trees to become largely absent in many areas. Several decades of work are now coming to fruition with the availability of potentially resistant cultivars for restoration. C_LIO_LIHere, using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) derived from whole genome sequences of over 200 trees, we investigate the genomic diversity of elm trees growing historically in Britain and Europe, and that of some new cultivars; including widespread native European and British elms; exotic elm species with natural resistance; and the often-complex hybrids between these and native elms available from the various breeding programmes and living collections. We also sequenced a variety of disease-resistant selections from Spain of interest for planting in Britain. C_LIO_LIWhile confirming many specimen labels and multi-generational crossing records, our results also revealed unexpected misidentifications and origins of some samples. This included past hybridisation in some resistant selections thought to be pure species. We find that within our samples, field elm (Ulmus minor) is more genetically diverse C_LIO_LIthan Wych elm (U. glabra). We show that over ten British elm morphological forms sometimes assigned species epithets fall within the genetic range of U. minor. C_LIO_LIWith their often-exotic parentage, many of the elm cultivars introduced into Britain post-epidemic inevitably represent a considerable increase in nucleotide diversity over the still numerically large, native U. minor and U. glabra populations. Currently, the cultivars are being planted mainly as ornamentals. Their long term arboricultural, adaptive and landscape suitability compared to native elms remains to be demonstrated. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.0%
2
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.3%
3
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.4%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.4%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.2%
6
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 19%
3.6%
9
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
10
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
11
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.4%
13
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
15
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
16
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
17
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
18
AoB PLANTS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
19
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
20
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Plant Pathology
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
22
Applications in Plant Sciences
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
28
Plant Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
29
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
30
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%