Back

Predicting Supramolecular Self-Assembly of Peptide Structures with AlphaFold3

Sklar, C.; Huh, S.; Chen, S.; Gray, J. J.

2026-04-30 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.04.28.720402 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Self-assembled peptide-based nanostructures have diverse applications in the pharmaceutical and materials fields, but accurately predicting their self-assembly behavior without time-intensive organic synthesis and characterization remains a significant challenge. Here, we assess the effectiveness of AlphaFold3 (AF3), a deep learning model for protein structure prediction, in modeling peptide-based nanostructures and the interactions driving supramolecular self-assembly. We designed amphiphilic peptides composed of alternating hydrophobic residues (valine, leucine, isoleucine, phenylalanine) and hydrophilic residues (glutamic acid), varying both sequence length and residue order. Using AF3s multimer mode, we modeled assemblies with copy numbers ranging from 10 to 1000, generating diverse morphologies such as micelles and nanotubes. We qualitatively analyzed hydrophobic regions, secondary structures, and intermolecular interactions, while also calculating radii of gyration, packing scores, and aspect ratios using PyRosetta. Our results indicate that AF3 predicts morphologies consistent with hydrophobic driving forces and steric constraints. Increased hydrophobicity correlates with smaller radii of gyration, while higher copy numbers correspond to smaller aspect ratios (more compact structures). Longer hydrophobic segments lead to disordered structures, whereas longer hydrophilic segments promote organization. While AF3 captures systemic trends consistent with biophysical principles, comparisons to literature reveal discrepancies driven by charge effects and secondary structure bias, including an overemphasis on helical propensity (e.g., alanine-rich sequences) and sensitivity to terminal charge repulsion. Additionally, since AF3 is predisposed to predict a single assembled entity rather than higher-order assemblies such as multiple micelles or fibers, finding the optimal copy number for the best prediction requires system-specific iteration. These limitations highlight the need for complementary approaches with controlled chemical potential and environmental conditions, though qualitative agreement with experimental trends in morphology and compactness supports AF3s utility for initial structure generation. Our findings highlight AF3s potential as a user-friendly design tool for structure generation in peptide design, aiding the efficient development of functional self-assembled peptide nanomaterials.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.8%
2
Small
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
3
Biomacromolecules
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
4
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.9%
5
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.0%
7
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.1%
8
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
9
Cell Reports Physical Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.9%
11
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
12
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
13
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
14
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
15
Nature Nanotechnology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
16
Langmuir
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
17
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
18
Journal of Controlled Release
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.9%
20
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
22
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
23
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.7%
24
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
25
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.7%
26
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.5%
28
ChemBioChem
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
29
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
30
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.5%