Back

Two Novel Genes, Stb23 and Stb24, Conferring Multi-stage Resistance to Zymoseptoria tritici: Rapid Deployment in Marker-Assisted Wheat Breeding

Yang, N.; Ovenden, B.; Baxter, B.; Williams, S.; Solomon, P. S.; Milgate, A.

2026-05-01 genetics
10.64898/2026.04.28.717151 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The fungal pathogen Zymoseptoria tritici poses a major global threat to wheat production, causing severe yield losses and necessitating intensive and costly fungicide applications. The increasing demand for durable genetic resistance has intensified interest in quantitative resistance loci, particularly those exhibiting multi-stage resistance (MSR), which suppress pathogen development continuously throughout the wheat life cycle. Many previously effective resistance genes are now showing declining efficacy, underscoring the urgent need for novel and long-lasting sources of resistance. In this study, we report the identification and genetic mapping of two quantitative resistance loci that address this need. The first locus, designated Stb23, is a major QTL on chromosome 1DS, with LOD scores exceeding 9 and explaining 6-36% of phenotypic variation at the seedling stage and 2-16% at the adult-plant stage. The second locus, designated Stb24, is a major QTL on chromosome 3DL, with LOD scores of approximately 10 and accounting for 11-30% of seedling-stage variation and 9-23% of adult-plant variation. Furthermore, two tightly linked KASP markers-snp_1D1217527 for Stb23 and snp_3D1077880 for Stb24-were developed and validated across three popular Australian bread wheat cultivars, providing practical tools for deploying these loci in breeding programs targeting improved resistance to Z. tritici. Key messageTwo significant major-effect resistance loci on chromosomes 1DS (proposed as Stb23) and 3DL (proposed as Stb24) were identified and characterized. Two tightly linked KASP markers with these loci were also discovered and validated for molecular-assisted breeding programs.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.4%
2
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
10.0%
3
Pest Management Science
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
4
Plant Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
5
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.2%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 28%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.1%
8
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
9
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
10
Fungal Genetics and Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
11
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
12
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
16
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
17
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
18
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
20
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
21
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
23
Molecular Plant Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
24
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
25
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%