Back

Non-Invasive Arterial Blood Pressure Waveform Generation in Critically Ill Patients: A Sensor-Based Deep Learning Approach

Harris, C. W.; Nnadi, B.; Rapuri, S.; Rattray, J.; Tenore, F. V.; Etienne-Cummings, R.; Stevens, R. D.

2026-04-29 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.64898/2026.04.28.26351954 medRxiv
Show abstract

Continuous monitoring of Arterial Blood Pressure (ABP) in critically ill patients requires invasive arterial catheterization, which carries risks of thrombosis, vascular injury and infection. Here, we train and validate a computational model for continuous non-invasive ABP estimation in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients using a novel wearable sensor array. The sensor acquires continuous high frequency photoplethysmography (PPG) and electrocardiography (ECG) signals which are used as inputs in a deep learning algorithm for beat-to-beat reconstruction of ABP waveforms. We include 28 patients enrolled in four ICU units at Johns Hopkins Hospital, comprising 15,489 five-second ECG and PPG segments. A CNN/LSTM hybrid architecture achieved an R2 of 0.812 and a sample-level mean absolute error (MAE) of 4.94 {+/-} 4.96 mmHg, with systolic and diastolic blood pressure MAEs of 6.38 {+/-} 6.62 and 3.99 {+/-} 4.53 mmHg, respectively. This performance closely approached an upper-bound model trained on contemporaneously acquired ground truth ECG and PPG signals (R2 = 0.824, MAE = 4.81 mmHg), indicating that the sensors retain most hemodynamically relevant information. Split-conformal prediction provided calibrated uncertainty intervals with coverage meeting nominal targets, offering a principled framework for bedside confidence assessment. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of accurate, continuous, non-invasive ABP waveform estimation from wearable biosignals in critically ill patients, establishing a foundation for reducing dependence on invasive arterial monitoring while preserving the waveform-level information essential for hemodynamic management.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.8%
3
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
4
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.3%
5
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
7
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
8
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
10
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
11
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.7%
12
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
13
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.1%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.8%
15
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
18
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
20
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
21
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.9%
23
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
26
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
28
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Physiological Genomics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
30
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%