Back

An mHealth-based social support program to improve antenatal care engagement and facility-based births in Uganda: A type I hybrid effectiveness-implementation clinical trial

Atukunda, E. C.; Mugyenyi, G. R.; Haberer, J.; Nghiem, V. T.; Atuhumuza, E. B.; Waiswa, P.; Musiimenta, A.; Kanyesigye, M.; Obua, C.; Siedner, M. J.; Matthews, L. T.

2026-05-01 public and global health
10.64898/2026.04.28.26351943 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundUgandan women and their children suffer from high maternal and perinatal mortality, often due to low antenatal care (ANC) and skilled birth usage. We partnered with community members, women and the Ugandan Ministry of Health to formatively develop an intervention (Support-Moms app) to improve health education, engage social support networks, and augment access to ANC and delivery by a formal health care provider (HCP) for pregnant women in rural Uganda. MethodsWe conducted a type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial to test the effectiveness of the Support-Moms intervention. We enrolled 824 pregnant women (<20 weeks gestation) living in Southwestern Uganda and randomized them (1:1) to standard of care or Support-Moms intervention. The primary effectiveness outcome was completion of a HCP-led skilled birth (discharge card) and was analyzed as intention-to-treat. Secondary outcomes included number of ANC visits, institution-based delivery, social support, quality-of-life, mode of infant delivery, pre-term birth, birth weight, obstetric complications and deaths (maternal, fetal, newborn). ResultsA total of 1,216 women were screened, and 824 pregnant women enrolled (mean age [~]28 years; gestation at enrolment [~]13 weeks). Complete outcomes were available for 818 (99%). The Support-Moms intervention increased HCP-led skilled births compared to standard of care (93% vs 84%; OR 2.51, 95% CI 1.57-4.03, p<0.001). Women in the intervention group were more likely to achieve [&ge;]4 ANC visits (84.1% vs 75.1%; OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.24-2.50, p=0.001) and less likely experience postpartum hemorrhage (9.1% vs 22.7%, OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.22-0.52, p<0.001) or for their neonates to require resuscitation (9.8% vs 13.7%, OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.45-0.99, p=0.001). Initiation of breastfeeding within an hour was higher (97.1% vs 71.7%, OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.15-3.44, p=0.001) and postnatal depression decreased (20.1% vs 27.1%, OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.49-0.94, p=0.019). More intervention participants reported adequate support, were birth-prepared and had a birth companion. There were no maternal deaths or differences in term births, birthweight, mode of delivery, perinatal mortality or other obstetric complications. ConclusionsIn rural Uganda, the Support-Moms mHealth-based, social-support intervention significantly increased HCP-led skilled births compared with routine care, while also improving ANC attendance, early breastfeeding initiation, birth preparedness, perceived social support and higher presence of companion at birth. Less women experienced PPH, neonatal resuscitation, and postnatal depression. Further evaluation should focus on the cost effectiveness and sustainability of this program. Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT05940831

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
14.1%
2
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.9%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.3%
5
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.7%
7
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.8%
8
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
10
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
11
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
12
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
13
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.5%
14
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
16
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
18
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
19
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
20
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
21
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
22
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
23
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%