Use of Registry Data to Improve Center Outcomes and Inform Global Care Standards in Adult Cystic Fibrosis
Joshi, R.; Lazaro, S.; Purohit, S.; McKie, K.; Forseen, C.; Taskar, V.
Show abstract
AimCystic fibrosis (CF) care has been transformed by CFTR modulator therapies, yet most efficacy data arise from clinical trials with restrictive eligibility criteria. Real-world registry data can capture treatment outcomes in broader, more diverse patient populations. We used the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry (CFFPR) data to evaluate longitudinal clinical outcomes, and care benchmarking at a single Adult CF Program Center over a decade. MethodsA retrospective, descriptive analysis of CFFPR data (2011-2022) was performed to assess trends in modulator use, lung function (ppFEV1), body mass index (BMI), respiratory microbiology, and pulmonary exacerbations (PEx). Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) methods were applied to compare outcomes across peak modulator eras: pre-modulator (2011), ivacaftor (2015), mixed-modulator (2019), and elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELE/TEZ/IVA) (2021). Program-level outcomes were benchmarked against national network metrics to assess adherence to guideline-based care. ResultsOver ten years, median ppFEV1 improved from 63.4% (2011) to 78.8% (2021), and BMI increased from 22.3 to 24.8 kg/m2. The proportion of adults experiencing more than one PEx annually declined from 39.7% to 19.5%, while Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P.a.) culture positivity decreased from 79% to 47%. ELE/TEZ/IVA therapy was associated with greatest clinical improvements. Program-level performance remained comparable to national network benchmarks, reflecting high adherence to standard care metrics. ConclusionRegistry-based CER provides valuable real-world insights into CF care effectiveness and quality improvement. This decade-long analysis demonstrates significant clinical gains associated with modulator therapies and highlights the importance of patient registries in monitoring outcomes, benchmarking care, and informing global CF care models and standards for rare disease management. Key Messages{square} Real-world registry data enables decade-long evaluation of CFTR modulator effectiveness. {square}Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor demonstrates the greatest clinical benefit among modulator therapies. {square}Benchmarking Adult CF Program performance against the Network of Adult CF Programs facilitates quality improvement and standard care guideline adherence. {square}Patient registries provide insights for personalized care, program-level decision-making, and international standards for rare disease management.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative sensitivity of Early Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease detection tools in school aged children 93%
- Changes in urinary glutathione sulfonamide (GSA) levels between admission and discharge of patients with cystic fibrosis 93%
- Prevalence and impact of oprD mutations in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains in cystic fibrosis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Two-way remote monitoring allows effective and realistic provision of home-NIV to COPD patients with persistent hypercapnia 92%
- Investigating a structured diagnostic approach for chronic breathlessness in primary care: a mixed-methods feasibility cluster Randomised Controlled Trial. 90%
- Phase 2 Study Design and Analysis Approach for BBT-877: An Autotaxin Inhibitor Targeting Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Normal Forced Vital Capacity Does Not Reliably or Equitably Exclude Restriction 90%
- Multiple breath-washout for pulmonary function assessment in young childhood cancer survivors: a multicenter study 90%
- Clinical utility of home versus hospital spirometry in fibrotic ILD: evaluation following INJUSTIS interim analysis 89%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.