Back

Use of Registry Data to Improve Center Outcomes and Inform Global Care Standards in Adult Cystic Fibrosis

Joshi, R.; Lazaro, S.; Purohit, S.; McKie, K.; Forseen, C.; Taskar, V.

2026-04-29 respiratory medicine
10.64898/2026.04.28.26351666 medRxiv
Show abstract

AimCystic fibrosis (CF) care has been transformed by CFTR modulator therapies, yet most efficacy data arise from clinical trials with restrictive eligibility criteria. Real-world registry data can capture treatment outcomes in broader, more diverse patient populations. We used the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry (CFFPR) data to evaluate longitudinal clinical outcomes, and care benchmarking at a single Adult CF Program Center over a decade. MethodsA retrospective, descriptive analysis of CFFPR data (2011-2022) was performed to assess trends in modulator use, lung function (ppFEV1), body mass index (BMI), respiratory microbiology, and pulmonary exacerbations (PEx). Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) methods were applied to compare outcomes across peak modulator eras: pre-modulator (2011), ivacaftor (2015), mixed-modulator (2019), and elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELE/TEZ/IVA) (2021). Program-level outcomes were benchmarked against national network metrics to assess adherence to guideline-based care. ResultsOver ten years, median ppFEV1 improved from 63.4% (2011) to 78.8% (2021), and BMI increased from 22.3 to 24.8 kg/m2. The proportion of adults experiencing more than one PEx annually declined from 39.7% to 19.5%, while Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P.a.) culture positivity decreased from 79% to 47%. ELE/TEZ/IVA therapy was associated with greatest clinical improvements. Program-level performance remained comparable to national network benchmarks, reflecting high adherence to standard care metrics. ConclusionRegistry-based CER provides valuable real-world insights into CF care effectiveness and quality improvement. This decade-long analysis demonstrates significant clinical gains associated with modulator therapies and highlights the importance of patient registries in monitoring outcomes, benchmarking care, and informing global CF care models and standards for rare disease management. Key Messages{square} Real-world registry data enables decade-long evaluation of CFTR modulator effectiveness. {square}Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor demonstrates the greatest clinical benefit among modulator therapies. {square}Benchmarking Adult CF Program performance against the Network of Adult CF Programs facilitates quality improvement and standard care guideline adherence. {square}Patient registries provide insights for personalized care, program-level decision-making, and international standards for rare disease management.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.8%
2
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.1%
4
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.6%
6
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
8
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.8%
10
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
11
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.4%
13
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
14
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
15
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
16
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
18
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
20
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
24
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
26
Respiratory Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
27
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
28
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%