Back

Diet-Associated Differences in the Rumen Microbiome and Resistome of Bangladeshi Cattle

Ahsan, S.; Islam, M. N.; Hasan, N. A.; Netherland, M.; Chakrabarti, M.; Noor, F.; Mohona, E. F.

2026-05-01 microbiology
10.64898/2026.04.27.721148 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Diet influences the composition, diversity, and functional capacity of the cattle gut microbiome. However, the extent to which feeding practices affect the microbial community and resistome under real-world conditions remains poorly understood, particularly in low- and middle-income settings. Here, we applied metagenomics to fecal samples from Bangladeshi cattle fed either a natural or a mixed diet to examine differences in microbial composition, functional potential, and resistome associated with feed type. Natural-fed cattle harbored higher microbial diversity and distinct bacterial phyla, including Bacteroidota, Campylobacteriota, and Mycoplasmatota. Acinetobacter, Aliarcobacter, Comamonas, Dysosmobacter, and Sharpea were enriched in natural-fed cattle, whereas Anaerotignum, Aristaeella, Oscillibacter, and Clostridium were more abundant in the mixed-fed group. Notably, the emerging zoonotic genus Aliarcobacter was detected in the natural-fed cohort. Alpha diversity analysis showed higher richness and evenness in natural-fed cattle, and a clear separation between dietary groups in beta diversity analysis (PERMANOVA, p = 0.01). Differential analysis identified Oscillibacter ruminantium as a biomarker of natural feeding, while Succinivibrio faecicola and Anaerovibrio slackiae for mixed feeding. Resistome profiles demonstrated clear differences. Mixed-fed cattle showed a consistent enrichment of tetracycline resistance genes, whereas the natural-fed group displayed a more variable resistome. Functional analysis suggested diet-associated differences in metabolic potential, with glutathione metabolism enriched in natural-fed cattle (p<0.05) and bile secretion and fatty acid metabolism moderately enriched in the mixed-fed group. These findings indicate that feeding practices are associated with differences in rumen microbial communities and resistome profiles in Bangladeshi cattle, providing baseline insights into microbiome-resistome relationships under field conditions.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.7%
2
Animal Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.8%
3
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.0%
4
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
6
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.4%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.1%
8
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.7%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.7%
10
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
11
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
12
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
14
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.4%
15
Gut Microbes
70 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
17
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.8%
21
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
Current Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
23
Microbiology Resource Announcements
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
24
Environmental Microbiology Reports
27 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%