Back

Modelling Anaerobic Co-Digestion with Agricultural Feedstock: Model Validation and Cross-Reactor Verification

Murali, R.; Dekhici, B.; Chen, T.; Zhang, D.; Short, M.

2026-04-30 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.04.27.721061 bioRxiv
Show abstract

As the United Kingdom (UK) targets net-zero emissions by 2050, anaerobic digestion (AD) has become a cornerstone of renewable energy infrastructure. However, mathematical models, such as the Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 (ADM1), often struggle with high-solids agricultural feedstocks because they rely on Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), a metric that introduces significant experimental error. To overcome this, this study applies an established mass-based ADM1 framework tailored for the co-digestion of maize silage and cow manure sourced from a UK AD site. This study uses a parallel reactor framework, using two identical laboratory-scale reactors to physically replicate the dynamic conditions of the full-scale site. A Global Sensitivity Analysis was first conducted, identifying biomass decay and carbohydrate breakdown rates as the most influential factors affecting system stability and model accuracy. The model was calibrated using data from the first reactor and then tested against an independent second reactor subjected to significant organic loading stress. Results show high predictive capabilities, with the model achieving a R2 of 0.81 for biogas production during calibration. The model maintained high predictive accuracy during the validation test of the second physical twin, achieving an R2 of 0.85, proving that the framework is robust and not overfitted to a single dataset. While predicting rapid fluctuations in pH and alkalinity remains challenging, the mass-based approach effectively forecasts gas yields and process stability. This methodology provides a reliable foundation for robust process modelling, offering a scalable tool for the UK biogas sector to optimise AD. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=93 SRC="FIGDIR/small/721061v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (32K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@92c7e2org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@80d723org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@ac3d24org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e21a51_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.6%
2
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
3
Chemical Engineering Journal
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
4
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.9%
6
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
7
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
8
Metabolic Engineering
68 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
9
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
10
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
11
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
12
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
16
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.7%
18
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
19
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
20
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
21
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
22
Journal of Biological Engineering
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
23
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
24
PLOS Water
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
25
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
26
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
27
Chemosphere
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
28
Bioresource Technology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
29
Algal Research
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
30
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.7%