Back

What Can We Count On? Performance of Microplate Cell Counting Assays in 2D Monolayer and 3D ECM-based In Vitro Tumour Models

Vaezzadeh, M.; Nadort, A.; Igrunkova, A.; Lee, V. S.; Di Ieva, A.; Heng, B.; Guller, A.

2026-04-30 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.04.27.720021 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Accurate cell counting is essential in tissue engineering and cancer research. The ongoing transition towards advanced 3D in vitro tumour models raises a question about the validity of the standard cell counting protocols, particularly in the systems containing extracellular matrix-based scaffolds. Here, we provide a quantitative analysis of the performance of three popular plate reader-based cell counting/viability assays, such as the Alamar Blue, MTT, CellTiter Glo 3D assays, in 2D monolayer and 3D scaffold-based cultures of U251 human glioblastoma cells, including cell-laden Matrigel plugs, and original tissue engineering constructs based on the decellularised sheep brain scaffolds. We quantitatively characterized the assays linearity, precision, biological and technical reproducibility, proportionality, and inter-assay agreement. The study revealed that assays performance is highly platform-dependent, with 2D cultures allowing significantly more precise and reliable measurements than in 3D ECM scaffold-based cultures. The numerical results provided in this study can help researchers make informed decisions when working with 3D scaffold-based in vitro tumour models and for other tissue engineering purposes where precise cell counting is essential. ToC O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=184 SRC="FIGDIR/small/720021v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (39K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@16018d9org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1ff7d6dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@838021org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1510d5b_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
2
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
3
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.4%
4
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
6
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
7
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.9%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
11
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
13
Biomaterials Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
14
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
15
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
16
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
17
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
18
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
19
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
20
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
21
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
22
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
23
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
24
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
25
Integrative Biology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
26
Cytotherapy
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
27
Advanced Materials Interfaces
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
28
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
29
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
30
Tissue Engineering Part A
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%