Back

Pantoprazole Use in Invasively Ventilated Patients With Septic Shock: A Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

Kuriyama, A.; Heels-Ansdell, D.; Fernando, S. M.; Adhikari, N. K.; Lamontagne, F.; Teja, B.; Lewis, K. A.; Rochwerg, B.; Carayannopoulos, K. L.; Vazquez-Grande, G.; McIntyre, L.; Honarmand, K.; Chaudhuri, D.; Krag, M.; Zytaruk, N.; Cook, D. J.; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group,

2026-04-28 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.64898/2026.04.27.26351851 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSepsis is a recognized risk factor for upper gastrointestinal bleeding, yet sepsis-specific randomized evidence informing stress ulcer prophylaxis remains limited. ObjectiveTo describe the rationale, methods, and statistical analysis plan for a post hoc subgroup analysis evaluating pantoprazole versus placebo in invasively ventilated critically ill adults with septic shock enrolled in the REVISE trial (NCT03374800). MethodsThis study will be a post hoc extended subgroup analysis of the international, blinded, randomized REVISE trial, which enrolled 4,821 mechanically ventilated adults in 68 ICUs across 8 countries. Patients were randomized to intravenous pantoprazole 40 mg once daily or placebo during invasive mechanical ventilation. Septic shock will be defined as receipt of vasopressors or inotropes at baseline together with an admitting diagnosis of infection according to APACHE III diagnostic categories. ResultsThe primary efficacy outcome will be clinically important upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the ICU within 90 days after randomization, and the primary safety outcome will be all-cause mortality within 90 days. Additional trial outcomes will include patient-important upper gastrointestinal bleeding, ventilator-associated pneumonia, Clostridioides difficile infection during hospitalization, new renal replacement therapy, mortality in the ICU and hospital, and duration of ICU and hospital stay. Analyses will be adjusted for prehospital acid suppression; the mortality analyses will be additionally adjusted for APACHE II score. ConclusionThis protocol and statistical analysis plan describes an evaluation of the efficacy and safety of pantoprazole in patients with septic shock within a large randomized trial dataset.

Published in Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 14%
13.1%
2
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.7%
3
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
4
Critical Care Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
5
BMJ
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Trials
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
7
Critical Care Explorations
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.8%
9
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
10
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
Critical Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
12
Neurocritical Care
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
13
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
British Journal of Anaesthesia
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
15
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.1%
16
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
17
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.1%
18
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
19
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
20
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
21
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
22
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
23
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
24
Gastroenterology
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Nature Microbiology
155 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
26
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
27
Journal of Neurology
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%