Back

Pantoprazole Use in Invasively Ventilated Patients With Septic Shock: A Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

Kuriyama, A.; Heels-Ansdell, D.; Fernando, S. M.; Adhikari, N. K.; Lamontagne, F.; Teja, B.; Lewis, K. A.; Rochwerg, B.; Carayannopoulos, K. L.; Vazquez-Grande, G.; McIntyre, L.; Honarmand, K.; Chaudhuri, D.; Krag, M.; Zytaruk, N.; Cook, D. J.; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group,

2026-04-28 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.64898/2026.04.27.26351851 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSepsis is a recognized risk factor for upper gastrointestinal bleeding, yet sepsis-specific randomized evidence informing stress ulcer prophylaxis remains limited. ObjectiveTo describe the rationale, methods, and statistical analysis plan for a post hoc subgroup analysis evaluating pantoprazole versus placebo in invasively ventilated critically ill adults with septic shock enrolled in the REVISE trial (NCT03374800). MethodsThis study will be a post hoc extended subgroup analysis of the international, blinded, randomized REVISE trial, which enrolled 4,821 mechanically ventilated adults in 68 ICUs across 8 countries. Patients were randomized to intravenous pantoprazole 40 mg once daily or placebo during invasive mechanical ventilation. Septic shock will be defined as receipt of vasopressors or inotropes at baseline together with an admitting diagnosis of infection according to APACHE III diagnostic categories. ResultsThe primary efficacy outcome will be clinically important upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the ICU within 90 days after randomization, and the primary safety outcome will be all-cause mortality within 90 days. Additional trial outcomes will include patient-important upper gastrointestinal bleeding, ventilator-associated pneumonia, Clostridioides difficile infection during hospitalization, new renal replacement therapy, mortality in the ICU and hospital, and duration of ICU and hospital stay. Analyses will be adjusted for prehospital acid suppression; the mortality analyses will be additionally adjusted for APACHE II score. ConclusionThis protocol and statistical analysis plan describes an evaluation of the efficacy and safety of pantoprazole in patients with septic shock within a large randomized trial dataset.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.4%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
17.4%
3
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
4
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
6
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
7
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
8
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
9
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
11
Neurocritical Care
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
13
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
14
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
16
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
17
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
20
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
21
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
22
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
23
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
25
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
26
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
27
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Pediatric Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
29
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
30
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%