Back

Detection of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in infants and prediction of school-age lung function from tidal breathing data using recurrent neural networks

Falhi, A.; Gwerder, M.; Ruettimann, C.; Trachsel, D.; Frey, U.; Delgado-Eckert, E. W.

2026-04-28 respiratory medicine
10.64898/2026.04.27.26351808 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo test whether machine learning (ML) models trained on tidal breathing flow time series can discriminate between individuals with and without respiratory disease and predict lung function indices obtained from conventional pulmonary function testing. BackgroundAccurate assessment of respiratory function in infants and young children is challenging because conventional pulmonary function testing requires sophisticated equipment and/or active patient cooperation. Tidal breathing measurements, in contrast, can be obtained non-invasively with little or no patient cooperation and at low cost, yet their clinical utility has been limited. We hypothesized that sufficiently long tidal breathing flow time series contain clinically relevant information that can be extracted using a recurrent neural network known as a long short-term memory (LSTM) network. ApproachWe evaluated LSTM models in two scenarios within the Basel-Bern Infant Lung Development cohort. First, we assessed the ability of a model trained on flow and derived volume time series to detect bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in 329 infants. Second, we examined whether a model trained on tidal breathing flow alone could predict forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) in 135 school-age children. Signals were filtered and normalized prior to model training, and performance was evaluated on held-out test datasets. Main resultsFor BPD detection, the model achieved 97.0% accuracy, 100% specificity, 91.7% sensitivity, 100% precision, and an F1-score of 95.7%. For FEV1 prediction, Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean bias of -0.009 L (95% CI -0.091 to 0.074), with limits of agreement of -0.416 L and 0.399 L. The mean relative prediction error was 13.7%. SignificanceThese findings demonstrate that temporal patterns in tidal breathing flow signals contain diagnostically and functionally relevant information. ML applied to tidal breathing measurements may provide a low-burden, minimal-cooperation approach for early respiratory disease detection and functional assessment across early life stages.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.5%
3
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
4
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
5
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
7
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
8
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
9
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
10
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.6%
11
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.6%
12
Respiratory Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
14
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
15
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
16
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
17
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
18
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.8%
21
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
23
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
25
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
26
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
27
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
28
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%