Effects of online professional learning on healthcare professionals' knowledge and skill acquisition. A systematic review and meta-analysis
Griffith, S.; Swaryandini, G.; McKee, L.; Oxnard, K.; Cahill, L. S.; Forbes, H.; Rees, K.; Davis, J.; Sanders, T.; Coleman, J. A.; Graham, J.; Middleton, S.; Cadilhac, D. A.; Dale, S.; Fasugba, O.; Noetel, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundOnline professional learning offers a scalable alternative to traditional face-to-face learning, but there are doubts regarding how well it works and when it works best. This review assessed the effectiveness of online professional learning interventions on healthcare professionals knowledge and skill acquisition. MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials that compared online professional learning against static controls or face-to-face controls. We searched MEDLINE Complete, Scopus, Embase, CENTRAL, and PsycINFO from inception to January 31, 2025. Eligible studies included practising healthcare professionals in any clinical setting that measured knowledge or skill acquisition related to patient care. Data was extracted in duplicate, with disagreements resolved through discussion or by a third reviewer. We used multilevel meta-analyses to estimate the overall effect size and conducted moderation analyses for pre-specified factors. The study protocol was pre-registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF; https://osf.io/46zav). FindingsOf 55,376 records; 171 studies (391 effects, 25,412 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Online learning significantly improved knowledge and skill acquisition compared to static controls (g = 0.93, 95% CI [0.78,1.07], p < 0.001; I{superscript 2} = 89.8%), with larger effects in lower-middle income countries (g = 1.30, 95% CI [0.88, 1.72]) than in high income (g = 0.75, 95% CI [0.63, 0.86]). Online learning also significantly improves outcomes compared to face-to-face instruction (g = 0.45, 95% CI [0.31,0.59], p < 0.001; I{superscript 2} = 85.92%), with larger effects for knowledge outcomes (g = 0.46, 95% CI [0.33, 0.59]) than skills outcomes (g = 0.20, 95% CI [0.04, 0.36]). Effects did not differ significantly by profession, clinician experience, clinical setting, intervention characteristics or the learning design features (all p > 0.05). No studies had low overall risk of bias, and some evidence of publication bias was found. InterpretationFrom this body of evidence, we identified that online learning appears to improve healthcare professionals knowledge and skill acquisition, exceeding traditional teaching methods. Healthcare organisations can be confident implementing or expanding online professional learning to improve knowledge and skill acquisition. FundingNo funding
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 93%
- Knowledge and motivations of training in peer review: an international cross-sectional survey 92%
- Modelling the impact of behavioural interventions during pandemics: A systematic review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Addressing cultural and knowledge barriers to enable preclinical sex inclusive research 91%
- Female-dominated disciplines have lower evaluated research quality and funding success rates, for men and women 90%
- An Experimental Test of the Effects of Redacting Grant Applicant Identifiers on Peer Review Outcomes 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of statistical methods used to meta-analyse results from interrupted time series studies: a simulation study 93%
- Citation tracking for systematic literature searching: a scoping review 93%
- Exploring the potential of Claude 2 for risk of bias assessment: Using a large language model to assess randomized controlled trials with RoB 2 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based Chatbots in Promoting Health Behavioral Changes: A Systematic Review 92%
- Effectiveness of smartphone-based Community Case Management on urgent referral, re-consultation and hospitalization of children under-5 in Malawi: Results of a cluster-randomized, stepped-wedge trial 90%
- Remote working in mental health services: a rapid umbrella review of pre-COVID-19 literature 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.