School-based social prescribing to address youth loneliness: a pilot randomised controlled trial
Hayes, D.; Wright, J.; Bu, F.; Humphrey, N.; Qualter, P.; Han, E.; Sticpewich, L.; Maguire, S.; Umpierrez, L.; Burton, A.; Bone, J. K.; Stapley, E.; Tibber, M. S.; Booth, R. J.; Fancourt, D.
Show abstract
AimsYouth loneliness is associated with poorer mental health, educational disengagement, and adverse long-term health outcomes. While social prescribing shows promise in reducing loneliness in adults, access for young people remains limited as most pathways sit within primary care. Schools offer a near-universal point of contact and may provide a more accessible referral route. The INACT study aimed to pilot a school-based social prescribing pathway and assess its feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary signals of benefit for loneliness and related outcomes. MethodsPupils in Years 4, 5, 7 and 8 (ages 9 to 13; n=672) across 11 schools in London, Manchester, and Leeds were screened for loneliness. Those reporting elevated loneliness (n=140, 20.8%) were randomised to social prescribing or signposting. For follow-up, the social prescribing arm was capped at 41 pupils, and a matched subset of the signposting group (n=45) was followed longitudinally. Outcomes were collected at baseline, three-, and six-months. Feasibility indicators included recruitment, uptake, engagement, and retention. Acceptability and appropriateness were assessed using validated implementation measures and qualitative interviews with pupils and link workers. ResultsOne in five pupils reported elevated loneliness. In the social prescribing group, 83% initiated the pathway, attending a mean of 5.09 sessions, with most delivered in person. Implementation measures indicated high feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness. Interviews highlighted the importance of relational support and personalised activity matching, although some younger pupils needed support completing questionnaires. Preliminary analyses showed reductions in loneliness at three-months in both groups, with somewhat greater reductions in the social prescribing arm. ConclusionSchool-based social prescribing appears feasible and acceptable, with early indications of benefit. Schools may offer scalable infrastructure for addressing youth loneliness beyond healthcare pathways. A fully powered multi-site trial with economic evaluation is now warranted to determine effectiveness and long-term value. Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06656663
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Collecting genetic samples and linked mental health data from adolescents in schools: Protocol co-production and a mixed-methods pilot of feasibility and acceptability 94%
- Impact of school closures on the health and well-being of primary school children in Wales UK; a routine data linkage study using the HAPPEN survey (2018-2020) 94%
- Caregiver-mediated interventions to support self-regulation among infants and young children (0-5): A protocol for a realist review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trialling an Optimised social Groups intervention in services to Enhance social connecTedness and mental Health in vulnERable young people (TOGETHER): Study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial 94%
- COVID-19 mitigation measures in primary schools and association with infection and school staff wellbeing: an observational survey linked with routine data in Wales, UK 94%
- Factors influencing wellbeing in young people during COVID-19: A survey with 6291 young people in Wales 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A whole system approach to increasing children’s physical activity in a multi-ethnic UK city: a process evaluation protocol 92%
- Feasibility and acceptability of daily testing at school as an alternative to self-isolation following close contact with a confirmed case of COVID-19: A qualitative analysis 91%
- How is the COVID-19 pandemic impacting our life, mental health, and well-being? Design and preliminary findings of the pan-Canadian longitudinal COHESION Study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reducing Covid-19 risk in schools: a qualitative examination of staff and family views and concerns 93%
- Early activity and impact of a neighbourhood multidisciplinary team that integrates health, and social support for underserved children and young people in Birmingham, UK: an observational study 92%
- How young people experienced Long COVID services: a qualitative analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impacts of school closures on physical and mental health of children and young people: a systematic review 94%
- Susceptibility to and transmission of COVID-19 amongst children and adolescents compared with adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis 88%
- Clinical features and burden of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children and adolescents: an exploratory EHR-based cohort study from the RECOVER program 85%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.