Back

Structure-Guided Biochemical Design of DNA Tweezers As A Dual Target of the Primary Glioblastoma Biomarkers S100A4 and Midkine

Foo, H.; Sharma, G.

2026-04-29 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.04.26.720909 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is among the most aggressive malignant brain tumors originating from glial cells and characterized by severe infiltration into surrounding brain tissue, rendering early detection difficult with current diagnostic imaging methods. S100A4 has been identified as a biomarker protein associated with glioblastoma invasiveness due to its role in cell motility and tumor metastasis. Similarly, midkine (MDK) poses an optimal biomedical target for identifying GBM invasive phenotypes because of its connection to the tumor microenvironment and infiltrative proliferation. Both proteins notably possess a positive charge that interacts electrostatically with the negatively charged phosphate backbone of DNA. It has been established that early molecular detection remains a critical unmet need. This study investigates a promising strategy for GBM diagnosis based on how S100A4 and MDK can selectively bind with DNA tweezer nanostructures. Computationally predicting eight distinct nucleotide sequences yielded three-stranded, hinge-scaffolded tweezer conformations for each candidate. The target protein and DNA structures, derived from AlphaFold, were paired together by molecular docking simulations conducted with HDOCK. Docking analyses evaluated binding affinity, structural complementarity, and conformational stability of the complexes formed. Among the evaluated candidates, DT3_8 computationally established the most biochemically robust interaction with both biomarker proteins. Selectivity is especially important because many S100 proteins share similar electrostatic profiles, yet DT3_8 indicates stronger selectivity for S100A4 and MDK over other S100 family proteins. These findings establish a biomechanical basis for the development of nanoscale DNA biosensors, which suggests the potential for detecting invasive GBM phenotypes, preceding radiographic manifestation and pending experimental validation.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
12.6%
2
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.2%
3
Nanoscale
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
3.9%
5
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
6
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.6%
7
Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
Small
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Chemical Communications
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
10
Small Methods
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
11
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
13
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
14
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
15
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
17
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
18
Advanced Therapeutics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
19
Cell Reports Physical Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
20
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
21
Journal of Controlled Release
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
22
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
23
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
24
NAR Molecular Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
25
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
26
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
27
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
28
JACS Au
35 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
29
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
30
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%