Back

Advancing ab initio genome annotation with OrionGeno

Liu, L.; Cai, X.; Wang, S.; Deng, Y.; Wu, Y.; Pan, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhang, C.; Xia, H.; Tan, N.; Su, K.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, X.; Liu, L.; Wei, T.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Q.; Li, Y.; Yin, P.; Xu, X.

2026-04-29 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.04.26.720859 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The rapid expansion of eukaryotic genome sequencing has created an urgent demand for scalable and accurate gene annotation, particularly for large-scale genomic initiatives such as the Earth BioGenome Project (EBP). Existing ab initio methods often struggle with complex gene architectures and exhibit limited cross-lineage generalizability. Moreover, these frameworks typically treat repetitive DNA sequences (repeats) as genomic "noise" to be pre-masked, leaving the joint modeling of genes and repeats largely unexplored. Here we present OrionGeno, a multispecies phylogeny-aware deep learning framework for end-to-end eukaryotic genome annotation. By integrating phylogenetic context into model learning, OrionGeno resolves complex gene structure variations across divergent lineages, jointly predicting exon-intron architectures, UTRs, and repeats directly from genomic sequences. Across Vertebrates, Invertebrates, Viridiplantae and Fungi, OrionGeno consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods, achieving a 37.2% relative improvement in protein-level F1 score over the existing best-performing method. Beyond benchmarking, OrionGeno identifies novel loci within well-curated model genomes and generates high-confidence annotations for [~]1,200 previously uncharacterized species, expanding NCBIs family-level coverage by 40.5%. As an evidence-independent approach, OrionGeno bridges the gap between genome sequencing and functional discovery, holding promise for large-scale biodiversity initiatives like the EBP.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.