Understanding digital health use among postpartum women in Alberta, Canada: a qualitative focus group study
Kurkova, V.; Modanloo, S.; Wu, Y.; Tian, J.; Desnoyers, E.; Adu, M. K.; Wong, G.; Greenshaw, A.; Hayward, J.
Show abstract
The postpartum period involves profound physical, emotional, and social changes, yet many women report fragmented, infant-centered care that leaves their own needs insufficiently addressed. Digital health tools, including mobile apps, wearables, telehealth, and online resources, are increasingly used by postpartum women to seek information, support, and reassurance; however, little is known about how women experience these tools in their everyday lives. This qualitative study employed thematic analysis to explore the perspectives of postpartum women on digital health. Postpartum women ([≤]12 months after birth) living in Alberta, Canada, were recruited through maternity clinics and targeted social media advertisements. Four virtual focus groups (4-6 participants in each; 18 participants overall) were conducted via Zoom using a semi-structured guide on postpartum healthcare experiences, use of digital tools (apps, wearables, telehealth, AI), and perceived barriers and facilitators to adoption. Sessions were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded by multiple researchers. Thematic analysis identified 32 codes, organized into 12 subthemes and four overarching themes: navigating postpartum support networks; empowerment through digital health tools; conditions for acceptable digital health design; and when technology feels like a burden. Women appreciated multiple sources of support from midwives, public health nurses, peers, and online communities, but described care that quickly became infant-focused, leaving their own recovery and mental health under-addressed, particularly in rural settings. Digital tools helped mothers structure infant and self-care, track symptoms, and prepare for appointments, yet also created new forms of burden, including information overload, usability challenges, privacy concerns, and feelings of surveillance or pressure to perform. Participants emphasized personalization (flexible notifications, mother-focused content), embedded mental health support, integration with trusted providers, and co-designed, credible platforms endorsed by Canadian health systems. Overall, to be acceptable and effective, tools must center mothers needs and be embedded within a broader ecosystem of responsive, continuous care. Author summaryBecoming a parent is a major life change, and many women feel that support from the health system drops off once the baby is born. At the same time, new mothers are increasingly turning to mobile phone apps, wearable devices, online groups, and video visits to answer questions, track health, and feel less alone. We wanted to understand women lived experience with these digital tools after giving birth: what feels helpful, what feels burdensome, and what they would want in an ideal tool. Our research team, consisting of three PhD students, held four online focus group discussions (4-6 participants per group; 18 participants overall) with women in Alberta, Canada, who had given birth within the past year. They described digital tools as both empowering and exhausting. Apps and wearables helped them track feeding, sleep, and symptoms, organize daily life, and come better prepared for medical appointments. At the same time, constant tracking, frequent notifications, and unclear data practices could feel overwhelming, guilt-inducing, or intrusive. This study is an important first step in a larger co-design work. By listening closely to mothers stories, we gathered practical ideas about what a supportive postpartum app should (and should not) do. In future phases, we plan to work directly with postpartum women and frontline clinicians to turn these ideas into a user-friendly, trustworthy digital tool that supports both mothers and babies health.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- “The impact of the Little Orange Book on how parents/carers manage symptoms of illness in children: A mixed methods study” 95%
- Nurses’ experience of using video consultation in a digital care setting and its impact on their workflow and communication 95%
- “Endless Opportunities”: A qualitative exploration of facilitators and barriers to scale-up of two-way texting follow-up after voluntary medical male circumcision in Zimbabwe 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving Heart disease risk through quality-focused diet logging: pre-post study of a diet quality tracking app 92%
- Assessing the accuracy of a digital symptom checker tool for suggestion of reproductive health conditions: a clinical vignettes study 91%
- Challenges for non-technical implementation of digital proximity tracing: early experiences from Switzerland 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mothers’ experiences of using Facebook groups for local breastfeeding support: results of an online survey exploring midwife moderation 96%
- Developing contents for a digital drug adherence tool with reminder cues and personalized feedback: a formative mixed-methods study among children and adolescents living with HIV in Tanzania 95%
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A qualitative study investigating the acceptability of cervical screening and self-sampling in postnatal women at 6-week postnatal check-up 93%
- Patients’ and carers’ experiences of, and engagement with remote home monitoring services for COVID-19 patients: a rapid mixed-methods study 93%
- Trauma informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors affecting the mental health of pregnant women using UK maternity services during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative interview study 96%
- What are the mechanisms of effect of group antenatal care? A systematic realist review and synthesis of the literature 94%
- Giving birth in a Pandemic: Women’s Birth Experiences in England during COVID-19 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.