Back

Neural and behavioural measures from attention testing show no support for efficacy of neurofeedback treatment for adult ADHD

Wang, J.; Rodionov, A. E. D.; Cowley, B. U.

2026-04-28 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.04.26.26351764 medRxiv
Show abstract

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is associated with impairments in sustained attention and inhibitory control. Neurofeedback (NFB) is a widely used non-pharmacological treatment for ADHD and is generally well tolerated, but evidence for its efficacy remains mixed. Here we report results from secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial of NFB training for adult ADHD, analysing behaviour and neural data from attention testing in both test-retest and treatment-vs-waiting list control group contrasts. We used electroencephalography (EEG) to investigate event-related cortical dynamics during the Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA), administered before and after NFB treatment. 44 adults with ADHD (NFB treatment, ADHD-T: n = 23; waitlist control, ADHD-W: n = 21) completed the TOVA before and after the NFB training period, while 128-channel EEG was recorded. Treatment-related change was examined through analyses based on behavioural TOVA performance, power spectral density, and event-related potentials, analysed with Bayesian linear mixed models. We found no meaningful evidence for NFB-specific improvements in TOVA behavioural performance over time, and no evidence that NFB modulated ERP or spectral indices relative to the ADHD-W group. Overall, we found no evidence that NFB treatment meaningfully benefited sustained attention or inhibitory control in adults with ADHD.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.