Back

DIRD+: A Browser-Based, Offline-First Clinical Platform for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Using Edge AI Inference in Low-Resource Settings

Baier-Quezada, N.; Almendras, C.; Uribe-Hernandez, V.; Barrientos-Toledo, H.; Leiva-Fernandez, C.; Arrigo-Figueroa, M.; Brana-Pena, F.; Macilla-Leiva, A.; Lopez-Moncada, F.

2026-04-27 health informatics
10.64898/2026.04.26.26351745 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the leading cause of preventable blindness in working-age adults. In Chile, despite GES coverage since 2006, screening reaches only ~21% of the diabetic population under control. Chilean evidence shows that autonomous AI screening platforms have produced heterogeneous field results (sensitivity 40.8-100%, specificity 55.4%), while Ophthalmic Medical Technologists (TMOs) consistently achieve >97% sensitivity, suggesting AI is most effective as structured support for trained professionals rather than as an autonomous filter. Objective: We present DIRD+ (Diabetic Integrated Retinal Diagnosis), an open-source clinical platform that performs complete DR clinical workflows - patient management, AI-assisted lesion detection, clinical classification, annotation, and report generation - entirely within the web browser using WebAssembly-based inference, without transmitting patient data to any server. This work describes the system architecture and a preliminary technical validation. Methods: DIRD+ implements a six-stage inference pipeline using ONNX Runtime Web (v1.23) with SIMD and multi-thread optimizations, a pluggable clinical guideline engine (ICDR 2024, MINSAL Chile 2017), and a human-in-the-loop annotation workflow. A YOLOv26n detection model was trained on 500 pseudo-labeled APTOS 2019 images using the Annotix framework [11] and evaluated on the IDRiD test set (n=81 images). Results: Optic disc detection - the spatial calibration landmark - achieved AP=1.000 on IDRiD (IoU=0.1). Soft exudate detection achieved AP=0.243 (F1=0.364). Internal validation mAP50=0.578. Browser-based inference averaged 0.297 s/image (3.4 images/second) on CPU without GPU. Lesion detection performance reflects a first-generation model trained on 500 images; progressive improvement through collaborative annotation is ongoing. Conclusions: DIRD+ demonstrates that a complete offline-first DR clinical workflow can be deployed at zero cost within a standard web browser without server infrastructure or GPU. The pluggable guideline engine and human-in-the-loop architecture make DIRD+ a viable tool for TMO-assisted screening in connectivity-limited primary care settings.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
10.0%
3
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.2%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.8%
5
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
6
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
7
Ophthalmology Science
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
8
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.0%
10
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
11
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
12
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
13
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
14
Translational Vision Science & Technology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
British Journal of Ophthalmology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
17
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
18
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
19
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
22
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
23
Journal of Vision
92 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
26
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
28
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
29
Eye
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
30
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%