Back

Leveraging Open-Source Solutions to Build a Low-Cost Digital Pathology Pipeline for Translational Research

Stenberg, J.; Gullapalli, A.; Foucar, K.; Babu, D.; Redemann, J.; Joste, N.; Foucar, C.; Gratzinger, D.; George, T.; Ohgami, R.; Gullapalli, R. R.

2026-04-27 pathology
10.64898/2026.04.25.26350240 medRxiv
Show abstract

Digital Pathology (DP) is a fast-emerging branch of pathology focused on digitizing pathology data. A key challenge of DP usage for pathology laboratories, especially mid- to small-sized clinical labs, are the upfront costs associated with instrumentation and the logistical challenges of implementation. In the current project, we built an end-to-end DP solution using low-cost, open-source components that is user-friendly at a small scale. We repurposed readily available microscopy components in a pathology lab to assemble a fully functional DP pipeline for translational research applications. We tested multiple low-cost complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) cameras in this project and chose a user-friendly Canon camera for image acquisition. An open-source DP server solution, OMERO v.5.6.4, was used as the image management system (IMS) to host and serve the WSIs on an Ubuntu 22.04 operating system. The server-hosted WSI images were evaluated remotely and asynchronously by multiple pathologists physically situated in Albuquerque, NM; Salt Lake City, UT; and Palo Alto, CA. Each pathologist assessed the quality of the WSI pipeline, image quality, and WSI interaction experience using a 23-question survey. Overall, the custom, low-cost WSI pipeline was noted to be a robust and user-friendly experience by the pathologists. The current DP setup is unlikely to be useful as a commercial, scalable DP pipeline for large-scale clinical applications. However, it demonstrates the feasibility of creating customized, small-scale DP solutions (at a low price point) for asynchronous translational pathology research applications. Additionally, building customized DP pipelines provides excellent educational opportunities for pathology residents to gain in-depth knowledge of the various technical elements of a DP workflow. In summary, we have established a low-cost, end-to-end WSI DP pipeline useful for spatiotemporally asynchronous translational pathology research, in an academic setting.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.8%
2
Journal of Pathology Informatics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.1%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.1%
4
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
5
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
6
Advanced Intelligent Systems
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
7
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
8
Journal of Microscopy
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
9
Journal of Visualized Experiments
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
10
Biological Imaging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
11
Modern Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
12
Animals
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
13
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
14
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
16
The Journal of Pathology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
17
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.1%
19
Journal of Cell Science
393 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
20
Journal of Clinical Pathology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
21
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
22
Molecular Cancer Research
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
24
Journal of Biomedical Optics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
25
Tuberculosis
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
26
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
28
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
29
Journal of Molecular Biology
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
30
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%