Back

Disentangling Fatigue from Depression among Survivors of Severe COVID-19

Cabrera, J. R.; Pham, P.; Boscardin, W. J.; Makam, A. N.

2026-04-27 primary care research
10.64898/2026.04.24.26351694 medRxiv
Show abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose: Survivors of severe COVID-19 commonly experience post-intensive care syndrome (PICS), which includes depression and fatigue. Fatigue is far more common and may inflate depression severity given overlapping symptoms. We sought to disentangle fatigue from depression in PICS. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the RAFT COVID study, a national multicenter longitudinal cohort of severe prolonged COVID-19 survivors. We included participants who completed validated surveys at 1-year from hospitalization for depression (PHQ-9) and fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue). We described correlation of FACIT-fatigue with the PHQ9, and separately with PHQ-2 and PHQ-7, which both omit the two items we hypothesized are influenced by fatigue: tiredness and sleeping. Using a MIMIC model, we performed differential item functioning to evaluate the impact of fatigue on depression directly through these two questions and indirectly with the latent depression construct. We then compared PHQ-7 to PHQ-9 scores by fatigue status. Results: Among 82 participants, 61.0% reported fatigue (reverse-scored FACIT-Fatigue[&ge;]9), and 15.9% moderately severe depression (PHQ-9[&ge;]10). FACIT-fatigue was strongly correlated with PHQ-9 (r=.87, p<.001), but less so for PHQ-2 (r=.76, p<.001) and PHQ-7 (r=.82, p<.001). The MIMIC model identified significant direct effects on tiredness ({lambda}=.89, p<.001) and sleep ({lambda}=.52, p<.001). Among fatigued participants, the rescaled PHQ-7 was lower than the PHQ-9 (median of 4.5, IQR 1.50-9.75, vs 7, IQR 4-9.75). Conclusions: Fatigue significantly inflated depression symptoms in severe COVID-19 survivors through tiredness and sleeping PHQ-9 items. PHQ-2 may better screen for true depressive symptoms in PICS, minimizing the risk of misdiagnosis and overtreatment.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.4%
2
Journal of Sleep Research
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
3
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.5%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.7%
6
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.8%
7
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
8
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
9
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
10
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.4%
12
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
13
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
14
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.9%
16
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
18
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
19
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
22
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
23
Mitochondrion
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
24
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
JAMA Psychiatry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
27
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%