Back

LANTERN: Leveraging Local Ancestry Tracts to Enhance Rare-Variant Aggregate Association Testing

Wang, Y.; Tuftin, B.; Raffield, L. M.; Hidalgo, B.; Kerns, S. L.; DeWan, A. T.; Leal, S. M.; Auer, P.

2026-04-27 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.04.24.26351693 medRxiv
Show abstract

Individuals with admixed ancestry comprise a significant proportion of populations of the Americas. Statistical methods have been developed to specifically leverage local ancestry inference to enhance the power and interpretability of genome-wide association studies in admixed populations. However, no such methods currently exist to test for rare-variant aggregate associations. Here we present LANTERN (Leveraging local ANcestry Tracts to Enhance Rare variaNt aggregate associations), a method that infers the alleles that lie on each ancestral haplotype and conducts rare-variant aggregate association testing in a generalized linear mixed model framework. Through simulation studies we demonstrated that LANTERN achieves proper control of Type 1 error while boosting power to detect associations when causal alleles predominately lie on one ancestral haplotype. Using data from a cohort of African American participants from the Jackson Heart Study, LANTERN identified two genes known to be involved in red-blood cell (RBC) biology when local ancestry information was incorporated. Specifically, a burden of rare alleles on European ancestral haplotypes in EPO was associated with both hemoglobin levels (HGB) and RBC counts, whereas a burden of rare alleles on African ancestral haplotypes in EPB42 was associated with HGB and RBC. In summary, LANTERN (i) allows for the identification of ancestry-specific rare-variant associations; and (ii) enhances rare-variant association signals compared to an analysis that ignores local ancestry. LANTERN is implemented in R and is freely available on GitHub.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.