Back

Methodological and Clinical Validation of TholdStormDX v0.0.1: An Advanced Stochastic Engine for the Optimization of Thresholds and Multimarker Panels Applied to Oncology

Reinosa, R.

2026-04-27 oncology
10.64898/2026.04.24.26351692 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionThe translation of biomarkers into binary clinical decisions requires the determination of precise cut-off points. This study validates the TholdStormDX v0.0.1 tool, a mathematical engine that employs Dual Annealing, 2- and 4-parameter logistic fitting, and vectorized Monte Carlo simulations for panel optimization under Boolean OR logic. MethodsThe tool was evaluated using datasets from four diagnostic domains (Pulmonary Nodules, Hepatocellular Carcinoma [HCC], Cervical Cancer, and Breast Cancer), along with a prognosis-oriented analytical context (Breast Cancer). Validation followed a strict workflow: characterization and selection of the best individual and combined thresholds in the Training (Train) and Validation (Val) sets, using the Test set in a completely independent manner, solely to assess the models performance and generalizability. ResultsThe tool enabled precise derivation of cut-off points for both individual biomarkers and multivariable combinations. Evaluation on the Test set objectively demonstrated in which scenarios a single biomarker outperforms a complex panel, promoting clinical parsimony. For example, in Breast Cancer diagnosis, an individual predictor outperformed the optimized panel (Sensitivity: 0.953 / Specificity: 0.952 in Test); conversely, in Hepatocellular Carcinoma, the multivariable combination showed superior performance compared to the single marker (Sens: 0.707 / Spe: 0.718 in Test). Additionally, the self-auditing system effectively flagged metric degradation when noisy variables were included, preventing potential issues. ConclusionTholdStormDX v0.0.1 proves to be a robust and transparent bioinformatics platform for deriving clinical thresholds. Its main contribution lies in mitigating local minima and promoting clinical parsimony, enabling researchers to objectively identify when a single biomarker is sufficient and when a panel provides real added value. Furthermore, it transforms the problem of biological noise into a safety feature: by systematically warning about algorithmic instability, it prevents overfitting and ensures the clinical viability of medical decisions. AvailabilityThe software is free and distributed under the GNU GPLv3 license. TholdStormDX v0.0.1 is written in Python, and its source code is available at the following GitHub address: https://github.com/roberto117343/TholdStormDX. Contactroberto117343@gmail.com

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.5%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 5%
7.1%
3
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 19%
5.1%
5
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
6
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
7
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
8
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
9
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.0%
10
Biology
45 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
11
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
12
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
13
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
14
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
15
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
16
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
17
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
18
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
19
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
20
BMC Medical Research Methodology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
21
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
22
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.4%
23
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.4%
24
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
25
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.1%
26
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
27
Metabolites
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
28
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
29
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
30
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%