Back

The Rhythm of Normality: A Comprehensive Normative Database for TMS-EEG Metrics with Reliability Characterization

Couto, B. A. N.; De Martino, E.; Mazhari-Jensen, D.; Jakobsen, A.; Bach, M. M.; Gianotta, A.; Ingemann-Molden, S.; Graven-Nielsen, T.; Casali, A. G.; de Andrade, D. C.

2026-04-27 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.04.23.720403 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation combined with electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) offers unique insights into cortical excitability and connectivity, yet current analyses are primarily limited to group-level inferences with little validation of individual reliability and feature redundancy. ObjectiveTo construct a comprehensive, open-access, and reliable normative dataset of TMS-EEG features that enables individual-level comparison MethodsWe aggregated TMS-EEG data recorded over the primary motor cortex (M1) from 164 healthy adults (30.8 {+/-} 9.8 years; 88 female) across nine studies using harmonized acquisition and preprocessing pipelines. Reliability analysis was conducted on a test-retest subset (N=57) for 968 extracted features, evaluating systematic bias, absolute error, and relative reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient categorized by the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval). Additionally, feature clustering was performed to quantify redundancy and correlations across the high-dimensional feature space. We then established normative distributions and developed an online benchmarking platform. ResultsReliability analyses (N=57) of the high-dimensional feature set revealed that 525 out of 968 features (54.3%) met at least moderate reliability standards (ICC lower bound > 0.5). Cluster analysis indicated substantial redundancy among metrics, with three distinct clusters having a moderate-to-high internal correlation (|r| = 0.64, 0.48, 0.39, respectively). Finally, normative data from the database identified abnormal results in a test patient, supporting the feasibility of individual-level classification in an open-science framework. ConclusionsHarmonization of data acquisition and analysis pipelines led to the development of a reliable normative M1 TMS-EEG reference. This publicly available resource provides a validated tool for future individual-level classifications and an open platform for ongoing community contributions.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.4%
2
Clinical Neurophysiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.7%
4
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.3%
6
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
7
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
9
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
10
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
11
Epilepsia
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.3%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
13
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
14
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.9%
15
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
16
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
18
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
22
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
23
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.7%
24
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
26
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%