Back

Mechanics of Esophageal Retraction During Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Lee, C.; Flores, A. R.; Culcu, M.; Ropper, A. E.; Avila, R.

2026-04-27 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.04.23.720008 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Dysphagia, difficulty swallowing due to irritation or damage to the esophagus, is one of the most common complications following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), the most frequently performed cervical spine procedure in the United States. Surgical retraction hardware imposes sustained compression on the esophagus during surgery, generating nonuniform stress and strain fields that may contribute to temporary postoperative soft tissue damage. Current intraoperative assessment relies on visual inspection and manual inspection by the surgical team and does not provide quantitative measures of esophageal deformation, strain, or retraction displacement. Here, we present a comprehensive mechanics analysis of esophageal compression during ACDF that integrates experiments on esophageal phantoms, nonlinear finite element modeling, and theoretical thick-wall scaling relationships. Modeling results quantify peak contact pressures and corresponding stress distributions, identifying conditions under which circumferential strain in the compressed esophageal wall increases sharply as localized pressures approach the upper physiological range ([~]6-17 kPa). Parametric investigation of retractor blade width, placement depth, and polymeric biocompatible coating properties demonstrates that targeted, yet mechanically simple, design modifications can help to attenuate strain concentrations. In particular, the introduction of compliant polymeric coatings redistributes contact loads and reduces peak wall stress by up to 20% relative to unbuffered blades (17 kPa to 13.5 kPa). Increasing blade width from 20 mm to 50 mm further decreases peak interface stress from 2.48 kPa to 0.45 kPa, corresponding to an 82% reduction. Reducing these stresses may help limit mechanically induced complications such as postoperative dysphagia. Experiments performed on esophageal phantoms with embedded pressure sensors replicate surgical ACDF retraction protocols under displacement-controlled conditions. This setup establishes physiologically relevant loading and enables quantitative validation of computational predictions by correlating measured voltage output with contact pressure and esophageal deformation. Measured relationships between applied retraction displacement, contact pressure, and tissue deformation govern stress amplification during ACDF retraction. Together, these results establish a predictive mechanics framework that links retractor blade design variables to esophageal stress fields, providing quantitative criteria to mitigate soft tissue damage during ACDF. HIGHLIGHTSO_LI2D and 3D finite element models quantify esophageal wall stress during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) retraction. C_LIO_LIRetractor blade geometry influences stress distribution, with wider blades reducing localized tissue loading by up to 82% likely associated with post-surgical dysphagia. C_LIO_LICompliant polymeric buffer layers attenuate pressure and smoothen stress gradients to reduce peak tissue loading by up to 20% during retraction. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
2
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
3
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
4
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.4%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
8
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
9
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.9%
10
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.8%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.6%
12
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
14
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 27%
2.1%
16
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
17
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
18
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
19
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
20
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
21
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
22
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
23
Advanced Materials Interfaces
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
28
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
30
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%