Acceptance of approaching death in cancer and non-cancer patients according to general practitioners; a European Study in Primary Care
Zijlstra, M.; Raijmakers, N.; Veldhuijzen, N.; van den Block, L.; Moreels, S.; Vega-Alonso, T.; Miccinesi, G.; Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B.
Show abstract
BackgroundAcceptance of death is an important aspect of a good death and an indicator of high-quality palliative care. Limited evidence exists on the extent to which patients accept their approaching death and which socio-demographic or end-of-life care characteristics are associated with acceptance, in both cancer and non-cancer patients. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cross-sectional survey in representative GP networks in the Netherlands and Italy (2013-2015), and Belgium and Spain (2013-2014). GPs registered all deceased adult patients in their practice, reporting health and care characteristics in the last three months of life and the level of acceptance of approaching death on a four-point scale ("1. Yes, completely" to "4. No, not at all"). Non-sudden deaths were included, totaling 2,796 patients (1,474 cancer; 1,322 non-cancer). ResultsAcceptance was recorded for 97% of patients (n=2,713), of which 17% were assessed as unknown. GPs assessed that 30% of patients had complete acceptance, with similar proportions in cancer and non-cancer patients (30% vs 29%). Multivariable logistic regression showed that older age (OR 1.03, 95%CI 1.02-1.04, p<0.01), country (OR 0.27 Belgium, OR 0.11 Italy, OR 0.10 Spain; reference: Netherlands), and palliative care by the GP until death (OR 1.39, 95%CI 1.07-1.79, p<0.01) were independently associated with complete acceptance. ConclusionSocio-demographic, contextual, and end-of-life care factors influence GP-assessed acceptance of approaching death, whereas a cancer diagnosis does not. These findings emphasize the importance of culturally sensitive, age-appropriate, and palliative care-oriented approaches to support patient acceptance at the end of life.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Response and role of palliative care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national telephone survey of hospices in Italy 95%
- Defining and measuring unmet palliative care needs among people with life-limiting illness: a scoping review of international evidence 94%
- Place, cause and expectedness of death and relationship to the deceased are associated with poorer experiences of end-of-life care and challenges in early bereavement: Risk factors from an online survey of people bereaved during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Family physicians supporting patients with palliative care needs within the Patient Medical Home in the community: An Appreciative Inquiry qualitative study 94%
- The impact of patient-centered care on quality of life and hope among patients receiving home medical care: The Zaitaku Evaluative Initiatives and Outcome Study 94%
- Which factors should be included in triage? An online survey of the attitudes of the UK general public to pandemic triage dilemmas 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- End-of-life care in hematological malignancies – a nationwide comparative study on the Swedish Register of Palliative Care 95%
- Life expectancy, quality of life, and hope among Japanese patients receiving home medical care 93%
- Bereavement care for ethnic minority communities: A systematic review of access to, models of, outcomes from, and satisfaction with, service provision 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Nurse-physician Communication around Identifying Palliative Care Needs in Nursing Home Residents 93%
- Changing dynamics of COVID-19 deaths during the SARS-CoV2 B.1.617.2 (Delta variant) outbreak in England and Wales: Reduced COVID-19 deaths among the Care Home residents 91%
- Mortality of Care Home Residents and Community-Dwelling Controls During the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020: Matched Cohort Study 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.