Nanopore Whole-Genome Sequencing for Rapid, Comprehensive Molecular Diagnostics of Brain Tumors in Adult Patients
Halldorsson, S.; Nagymihaly, R. M.; Bope, C. D.; Lund-Iversen, M.; Niehusmann, P.; Lien-Dahl, T.; Pahnke, J.; Bruning, T.; Kongelf, G.; Patel, A.; Sahm, F.; Euskirchen, P.; Leske, H.; Vik-Mo, E. O.
Show abstract
BackgroundClassification of central nervous system (CNS) tumors has become increasingly complex over the past decade, raising concerns about the availability, feasibility and sustainability of comprehensive molecular diagnostics. We have evaluated nanopore whole genome sequencing (nWGS) as a single workflow to replace multiple diagnostic assays. MethodsWe performed nWGS on DNA extracted from 90 adult CNS tumor samples (58 retrospective, 32 prospective) and compared the results to findings from standard of care (SoC) diagnostic work-up. Analysis was done through an automated workflow that consolidated diagnostically and therapeutically relevant genomic alterations, including copy-number variation, structural, and single-nucleotide variants, chromosomal aberrations, gene fusions and methylation-based classification. ResultsNanopore WGS enabled final diagnostic classification in all samples with >15% tumor cell content, requiring [~]3 hours of hands-on library preparation, parallel sample processing, and sequencing times within 72 hours. Methylation-based classification was available within 1 hour and was concordant with the integrated final diagnosis in 89% of cases (80/90). All diagnostically relevant copy-number variations, single-nucleotide variants, and gene fusions were concordant with standard-of-care testing, and MGMT promoter methylation status matched in 94% of cases. In addition, nWGS identified prognostic and potentially actionable variants that were not reported or covered by SoC. ConclusionsNanopore WGS delivers comprehensive genetic and epigenetic results with a fast turn-around compared to standard methods. This enables efficient, accurate, and scalable molecular diagnostics of CNS tumors using a single platform. Its broad applicability supports its implementation in routine clinical practice and may be extended to other cancer types requiring complex genomic profiling.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Genomic Characterization of Lung Cancer in Never-Smokers Using Deep Learning 92%
- Stratification Of Chemotherapy-Treated Stage III Colorectal Cancer Patients Using Multiplexed Imaging And Single Cell Analysis Of T Cell Populations 91%
- Targeted sequencing of FH-deficient uterine leiomyomas reveals biallelic inactivating somatic fumarase variants and allows characterization of missense variants 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- A subset of pediatric thalamic gliomas share a distinct DNA methylation profile, H3K27me3 loss and frequent alteration of EGFR 95%
- Optimising biomarkers for accurate ependymoma diagnosis, prognostication and stratification within International Clinical Trials: A BIOMECA study 94%
- Pediatric High Grade Glioma Resources From the Children’s Brain Tumor Tissue Consortium (CBTTC) and Pediatric Brain Tumor Atlas (PBTA) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- DNA methylation-based age acceleration observed in IDH wild-type glioblastoma is associated with better outcome - including in elderly patients 93%
- Ganglioglioma deep transcriptomics reveals primitive neuroectoderm neural precursor-like population 92%
- A New Mouse Model of Diffuse Midline Glioma to Test Targeted Immunotherapies 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical validation of Whole Genome Sequencing for routine cancer diagnostics 94%
- Optical Genome Mapping: Clinical Validation and Diagnostic Utility for Enhanced Cytogenomic Analysis of Hematological Neoplasms 91%
- Panel Informativity Optimizer (PIO): an R package to improve cancer NGS panel informativity 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.