Nanopore Whole-Genome Sequencing for Rapid, Comprehensive Molecular Diagnostics of Brain Tumors in Adult Patients
Halldorsson, S.; Nagymihaly, R. M.; Bope, C. D.; Lund-Iversen, M.; Niehusmann, P.; Lien-Dahl, T.; Pahnke, J.; Bruning, T.; Kongelf, G.; Patel, A.; Sahm, F.; Euskirchen, P.; Leske, H.; Vik-Mo, E. O.
Show abstract
Background: Classification of central nervous system (CNS) tumors has become increasingly complex, raising concerns about the sustainability of comprehensive molecular diagnostics. We have evaluated nanopore whole genome sequencing (nWGS) as a single workflow to replace multiple diagnostic assays. Methods: We performed nWGS on DNA extracted from 90 adult CNS tumor samples (58 retrospective, 32 prospective) and compared the results to findings from standard of care (SoC) diagnostic work-up. Analysis was done through an automated workflow that consolidated diagnostically and therapeutically relevant genomic alterations, including copy-number variation, structural, and single-nucleotide variants, chromosomal aberrations, gene fusions, and methylation-based classification. Results: nWGS supported final diagnostic classification in all samples with >15% tumor cell content, requiring ~3 hours of hands-on library preparation, parallel sample processing, and sequencing times within 72 hours. Methylation-based classification was available within 1 hour and was concordant with the integrated final diagnosis in 89% of cases (80/90). All diagnostically relevant copy-number variations, single-nucleotide variants, and gene fusions were concordant with SoC testing. MGMT promoter methylation status matched in 94% of cases. In addition, nWGS identified prognostic and potentially actionable variants that were not reported or covered by SoC. Conclusions: nWGS delivers comprehensive genetic and epigenetic results with a fast turn-around compared to standard methods. This enables efficient, accurate, and scalable molecular diagnostics of CNS tumors using a single platform. This data supports its implementation in routine clinical practice and may be extended to other cancer types requiring complex genomic profiling.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.