Back

Analytical performance of a multi-target open real-time PCR assay for simultaneous detection of tuberculosis, non-tuberculous mycobacteria, and drug resistance in a high-burden setting

Sidiq, Z.; Tyagi, P.; Anand, A.; Dwivedi, K. K.; Rajpal, S.; Chopra, K. K.

2026-04-24 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.04.23.26351557 medRxiv
Show abstract

Abstract Background Timely diagnosis of tuberculosis and drug resistance remains a cornerstone of effective disease control. Multiplex open molecular platforms capable of simultaneously detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBc), non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), and resistance to first-line anti-tuberculosis drugs could streamline diagnostic pathways. Methods We conducted a laboratory-based evaluation of two multiplex real-time PCR assays (MTBc/NTM R-Gene and MTB-RIF/INH R-Gene) using 300 well-characterized samples, including 150 MTBc-positive culture isolates (including rifampicin-resistant, isoniazid-resistant, and drug-susceptible strains) and 150 MTBc-negative samples (50 NTM isolates and 100 mycobacteria-negative specimens). Composite reference standards included culture, MPT64 antigen testing, and line probe assay corroborated by phenotypic drug susceptibility testing for resistance profiling, with NTM speciation performed using a dedicated line probe assay. DNA extraction was performed using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Germany), followed by amplification on a real-time PCR platform according to manufacturer instructions. The diagnostic performance was assessed against composite reference standards. Results The analytical performance for detecting MTBc demonstrated 100% sensitivity and specificity (150/150). NTM detection showed 70.0% sensitivity (35/50) and a specificity of 100%, highlighting limitations in coverage of NTM species. Rifampicin resistance was detected with a sensitivity of 96.0% (48/50) and specificity of 100%, whereas isoniazid resistance detection was 100% sensitive and specific (50/50). Agreement with established reference standards was high ({kappa}=0.76-1.00) within this analytical context. Interpretation This analytical validation demonstrates that multiplex open real-time PCR assays can accurately and simultaneously detect MTBc, NTM, and rifampicin and isoniazid resistance using culture isolates. While these platforms offer potential advantages in flexibility and expanded resistance profiling, additional studies on clinical diagnostic accuracy, cost-effectiveness analyses, and operational feasibility are required to determine their practical utility and programmatic impact in high-burden settings

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
42.1%
2
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.7%
3
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.9%
5
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
7
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.2%
8
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
9
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.8%
11
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
14
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
15
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
16
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
17
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
19
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
21
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
22
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
24
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
25
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
26
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%